ICAS ICAS logo

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Careers support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Finance + Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Business and governance
    5. Charities
    6. Coronavirus
    7. Corporate and financial reporting
    8. Cyber security
    9. Ethics
    10. Insolvency
    11. ICAS Research
    12. Pensions
    13. Practice
    14. Public sector
    15. Sustainability
    16. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD courses and qualifications
    2. CPD news and updates
    3. CPD support and advice
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

The most expensive tax breaks - battle lines on DIY self-build refunds

  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
Philip McNeil By Philip McNeill, Head of Taxation (Tax Practice and Owner Managed Business Taxes)

28 February 2020

Key points

  • The top five tax breaks cost the Treasury £98 billion
  • Closer supervision recommended
  • DIY self-build refunds as example of the battle lines

Philip McNeill looks at VAT refunds for self-build as an example of the battle lines on tax relief, and why attention to detail is everything.

An expensive tax relief

A recent National Audit Office report on the costs of tax reliefs, highlighted that zero-rating for VAT on new dwellings is in the top five most expensive tax breaks from the Treasury. It cost the Exchequer £14.8 billion in 2018-19.

Little wonder then that DIY VAT refunds on new dwellings can be a contentious issue. A string of cases have arrived at Tribunal over the last few months. From the demolished mobile home to the change of plan holiday let. They bring new meaning to the making fine distinctions.

What can we learn from HMRC and the Tribunal’s approach to these tax reliefs?

Out of time claims

The top challenge on DIY VAT refund claims must be out of date claims. The regulations (regulation 201 Value Added Tax Regulations 1995) say that claims must be made ‘no later than 3 months after the completion of the building’.

But what this means can cause confusion. Regulation 201 para 1 (b) (i) elaborates on what proof should be submitted saying ‘a certificate of completion obtained from a local authority or such other documentary evidence of completion of the building as is satisfactory to the Commissioners’.

This has led some people to incorrectly assume that the certificate of completion is the essential and only acceptable proof.

So, what has been recent experience at the Tribunal?

Contrary decisions

It will depend on specific circumstances, but there is a broad warning. Problems are likely to occur when claims are made after a property has been occupied; or where there is a long delay after the work has been substantially completed.

As only one claim can be made, the dilemma is that a claim too soon means no refunds on later supplies; but a claim too late means no refund at all.

When is it safe to rely on a council issued completion certificate and are there other hazards? A review of the cases holds the answer.

Remedial work

Sometimes issue of a completion certificate is delayed due to the need for remedial work. The Tribunal found, in Stewart Fraser (Stewart Fraser TC07367 [2019]UKFTT 0573(TC)), that building work may have been completed, even if it is later discovered that it would need ‘rectification’.

Even substantial rectification, would not, in the Tribunal’s view, alter the original date of completion.

The taxpayer argued that the building was not ‘completed’ until the remedial work had been done, and application could not be made to HMRC for a VAT refund until the local authority completion certificate was issued. But this overlooked the fact the taxpayer had been living in the property for a considerable period of time.

HMRC argued that the property was completed by the time the taxpayer moved in. This was just over two and a half years before HMRC received the VAT refund application, though within 3 months of the issue of the completion certificate.

The Tribunal concluded that the building was completed when final work was done, before rectification work, and within six months of the taxpayer moving in.

Completed on paper only

A bizarre turn of events in Stuart Farquharson (Stuart Farquharson TC07240 [2019] UKFTT 425 (TC)), finds HMRC arguing for an earlier ‘completion date’ than that shown on the completion certificate issued by the council in respect of a property which was significantly uncompleted.

This is particularly surprising given HMRC’s usual approach of expecting claims within three months of the council’s completion certificate.

A contra, the taxpayer argued that the building was uncompleted, despite the completion certificate having been issued by the local authority.

Fortunately, the Tribunal, having reviewed photographs and other evidence, was able to make a common sense judgement and, in the specific circumstances, accepted three months from the issue of the council completion certificate as the appropriate deadline.

Council completion certificate as primary evidence of completion

In Liam Dunbar (Liam Dunbar TC07504 [2019] UKFTT 747 (TC)), the Tribunal honed in on the phraseology of paragraph 2 01 (b) (i) of the Value Added Tax Regulations 1995. This states:

‘a certificate of completion obtained from a local authority or such other documentary evidence of completion of the building as is satisfactory to the Commissioners’

In the Tribunal’s view this indicates that the local authority completion certificate is the primary, and default evidence of completion.

‘It must in our view be assumed that the regulations have been framed in a way which is intended to make it relatively straightforward for both the taxpayer and for HMRC to determine when completion of the building has taken place’.

If, as HMRC contended in this case ‘the date of completion depends on all of the facts and circumstances, it would be almost impossible to be sure when completion had taken place’.

In this case there was doubt as to the date of completion due to a delay in connecting a permanent water supply. The taxpayer had phoned HMRC for advice, and in an unrecorded call, said they were advised to await a completion certificate from the council.

Extended timescale

In Satish Chander Arora (Satish Chander Arora and Another TC07489[2019] UKFTT 731 (TC)), there was another twist to reliance on the issue of a council completion certificate.

Here, the property was fit for habitation by the end of June 2015, liable to council tax from July 2015 and occupied from August 2015.

But the VAT refund claim was not made until July 2018 – almost three years later. Despite the fact that the completion certificate from the council was only issued in April 2018, the Tribunal took the view that there was sufficient evidence of earlier completion date.

In the Tribunal’s view ‘to determine when a building is complete, it is important to weigh all the evidence available. In essence, a building is deemed completed when the construction has been completed in accordance with the original plans, and as per HMRC’s guidance in VCONST02530, “when all main elements for it to function for its intended purpose are in place”.’

Scottish outcome

In Simon and Joanne Cotton (Simon and Joanne Cotton TC07553 [2020] UKFTT 0057(TC)), the story had an unusual Scottish twist, with the Tribunal using council certificate date, while saying that this would not have applied in England. See Tax and location - when it pays to be Scottish.

New build versus extension

Even clearing the hurdles of completion dates, there are other hurdles. DIY Zero rating applies to new build, not to extensions. In John Watson (John Watson and Another TC07513 [2020] UKFTT 5 (TC)) a new building had been created by the novel route of creating brick walls around a mobile home and then removing the mobile home from within.

HMRC argued that the work amounted to an extension and no refund was due. The Tribunal decided, contrary to HMRC’s view, that the building work undertaken on their home amounted to a new build, rather than an extension.

But just as victory was within sight, the taxpayers’ hopes were dashed by s35 (1) (b) VATA 1994. The Tribunal pointed out that, contrary to what that section requires, the taxpayers’ building was illegal. Planning permission was only for an extension to a mobile home.

Interestingly the same hurdle of incorrect planning permission caused another claim to fail. David Stewart’s planning permission did not match what had been built (David Stewart TC07561 [2020]UKFTT 0065(TC)).

HMRC guidance

The principle source if information are Gov UK Building a new home and VAT; the VAT Construction Manual and the claim form – such as VAT431NB.

Conclusion

Whatever the tax break, attention is needed to the detail of the rules. While HMRC guidance may be informative, it is no substitute for reading the legislation.

Want to affect tax policy-making?

By Donald Drysdale for ICAS

18 November 2019

2022-11-mitigo 2022-11-mitigo
ICAS logo

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

ICAS logo

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: