ICAS ICAS logo

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Careers support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Finance + Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Business and governance
    5. Charities
    6. Coronavirus
    7. Corporate and financial reporting
    8. Cyber security
    9. Ethics
    10. Insolvency
    11. ICAS Research
    12. Pensions
    13. Practice
    14. Public sector
    15. Sustainability
    16. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD courses and qualifications
    2. CPD news and updates
    3. CPD support and advice
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

Which tax cases are suitable for Alternative Dispute Resolution?

Photo of three gathered chairs
  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
By James Kennedy CA CTA, Manager, EY

3 April 2019

Key points

  • ADR can work particularly well where there is a lack of clarity over the facts.
  • The majority of successfully settled ADR cases has involved small businesses or individuals, with the mediation conducted in a number of cases by telephone conference.
  • ADR may not be appropriate where challenging a settled HMRC position on a point of law.

James Kennedy CA is a manager in the EY Tax Controversy and Risk Management team, advising businesses and individuals in respect of a wide range of issues, including mediation under alternative dispute resolution (ADR).

In this article, James examines use-cases for ADR and when it can be an effective tool.

FTT judge said tax dispute “cried out” for Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)

The appropriateness of ADR was commented on in the postscript to the judgement in the case of Stirling Jewellers (Dudley) Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2019] UKFTT 44 (TC).

The judge stated: “The Appellant's cover letter to its Notice of Appeal says that an application for ADR had been made. That was very sensible. If ever there was a dispute which cried out for a determined attempt at Alternative Dispute Resolution, it was this one…

"Put bluntly, both parties' cases as advanced and pursued before the Tribunal were either factually or legally wrong in significant respects… there was… ample scope for the parties to have engaged co-operatively so as to properly identify and narrow the issues genuinely in dispute…

"Posturing and skirmishing in correspondence ultimately proved to be non-progressive, and there is an impression (we cannot put it higher than that) that the tone of the correspondence ended up driving the parties into polarised, and entrenched, positions.”

The above comments certainly promote the ADR process where the parties’ views have become entrenched. Indeed, it is worth considering ADR in many cases where there is a prolonged tax dispute.

Success stories

By taking a fresh approach to resolve a dispute collaboratively, ADR can achieve remarkable results in a short space of time. In one case a company had been in dispute for several years with HMRC over a 1982 valuation of an asset.

The company was convinced that the asset had a substantial value in 1982 giving rise to a nil capital gain; HMRC was convinced of precisely the opposite. We supported the client in making proposals to HMRC for a collaborative process.

The process involved both parties working together to understand why they differed so radically, starting with points of agreement, then moving on to joint agreement of a methodology or ‘decision tree’ for resolving differences, then jointly testing the evidence and arguments in favour of differing positions.

ADR can work particularly well where there is a lack of clarity over the facts.

This approach led to the resolution of the dispute within a single three-hour meeting on a basis which both the company and HMRC accepted was a reasonable expectation of what would have been obtained from litigation.

In this case, the joint development of a ‘decision tree’ was key – it forced both sides early on to confront the difficult but essential point of what was the most appropriate valuation methodology.

ADR can work particularly well where there is a lack of clarity over the facts. Even if a resolution cannot be reached, it is helpful to agree which issues are in dispute. In this event, it serves to narrow down the facts and legal points in dispute.

This occurred in a recent mediation where there was uncertainty around the facts and legislation pertaining to the availability of particular tax reliefs.

It can be useful to set out a ‘decision tree’ for each point.

At the end of the mediation day, there was a signed agreement setting out the proposed next steps and evidence required in order for HMRC to grant a particular relief.

In these situations, it can be useful to set out a ‘decision tree’ for each point which can serve as an agreed framework for the dispute. The above comments made by the judge suggest that he would have appreciated this approach.

Which cases are suitable for ADR?

A wide variety of mediations have taken place including matters such as taxpayer behaviour, tax reliefs, tax treatment of intellectual property transactions, badges of trade and whether a business was trading with a view to profit.

However, ADR may not be appropriate where challenging a settled HMRC position on a point of law.

Recent HMRC figures show that over half of the 1,411 ADR applications in 2017/18 were accepted. 82% of these accepted cases were successfully resolved through ADR during the year, avoiding the need for litigation.

HMRC has indicated the following situations in which ADR may be a practical option:

  • The dispute is factual rather than technical and there is likely to be a range of possible outcomes
  • Positions have become entrenched on an apparently ‘all or nothing’ technical issue, but there is scope to explore potential alternative technical analyses
  • The nature of the particular issue means litigation is unlikely to offer a cost-effective or efficient resolution (e.g., fact specific or limited precedent value)
  • There is uncertainty over the facts and/or which facts are relevant
  • There is a lack of clarity or understanding regarding the parties’ respective technical positions
  • Attempts to work collaboratively or agree a resolution have stalled, and a facilitated process may help the parties work together better to try and reach a resolution.

What has worked well and what problems have there been?

The fresh approach encouraged by an ADR process, generally with the support of a mediator, is a catalyst for both parties to focus on what is important to them and explore a mutually acceptable outcome.

This can enable false assumptions to be cleared up and alternative solutions to what might previously have appeared to be a binary issue to be identified.

The ADR process also provides an opportunity to air oral witness evidence so that both parties can consider how it would be viewed by a tribunal. In our experience, many HMRC officers underestimate the value of oral evidence, yet this may be the key to unlocking resolution of the dispute.

The resolution-focused dynamic of ADR makes it essential to have the relevant decision makers present or available on the mediation day. Without this, our experience shows that little progress can be made at mediation.

It may be appropriate to use ADR to resolve disputed aspects of larger and more complex cases.

The majority of successfully settled ADR cases has involved small businesses or individuals, with the mediation conducted in a number of cases by telephone conference.

The uptake of larger, more complex cases has been disappointingly small: in 2017/18 there were only eight Large Business ADR requests of which five were rejected by HMRC.

However, it may be appropriate to use ADR to resolve disputed aspects of larger and more complex cases, such as a mediated agreement as to whether information requested by HMRC is reasonably required, or a neutral evaluation of whether an R&D claim involves an advance in science or technology.

Conclusion

In summary, we should always keep ADR in mind where there is a dispute with HMRC. It can be a very effective tool if used correctly.

Jim Robertson CA: Chair of the Scottish Taxes Policy Forum

By Alex Burden, CA Tax

12 February 2019

2-23-marsh 2-23-marsh
ICAS logo

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

ICAS logo

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: