ICAS ICAS logo

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Careers support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Finance + Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Business and governance
    5. Charities
    6. Coronavirus
    7. Corporate and financial reporting
    8. Cyber security
    9. Ethics
    10. Insolvency
    11. ICAS Research
    12. Pensions
    13. Practice
    14. Public sector
    15. Sustainability
    16. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD courses and qualifications
    2. CPD news and updates
    3. CPD support and advice
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

The ICAS point of view: five more tax consultation responses

  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
By Susan Cattell, Head of Tax Technical Policy, ICAS

29 July 2018

Key points

  • ICAS has responded to more tax consultations and calls for evidence.

  • Recent responses have covered CGT Payment Window proposals, the OTS IHT Review, Online Platforms and Tax Abuse and Insolvency.

  • Let ICAS know what you think about tax proposals.

The bumper season for tax consultations and calls for evidence continues. Susan Cattell looks at 5 more recent responses submitted by ICAS.

CGT: Payment window for residential property gains (payment on account)

The government originally announced that it intended to introduce a 30-day payment window for CGT arising from the sale of residential properties in the Autumn Statement 2015.  Implementation was deferred but the change is now intended to take effect from April 2020.

This was a technical consultation on:

  • how the amount payable will be calculated;
  • the administration of the payments; and
  • changes to the existing CGT payment on account system for non-residents who dispose of UK residential property.

In addition to commenting on these points, the ICAS response also questioned the justification for introducing the 30-day payment window and expressed significant concerns about the practicalities of complying with the new regime.

Calculating a CGT liability can be a complex and lengthy process, particularly where valuations are required. A CGT liability can also arise where no money has been received, for example where a gift has been made. Furthermore, the CGT rate to be applied to a disposal will depend on the level of income for the tax year – which may not be known at the time of the disposal.

Making a ‘payment on account’ within 30 days will present significant practical problems in some cases and could give rise to unfairness. The consultation document does not address complications which will arise from trying to deal with a gain in-year when the CGT rules and reliefs are designed to work on the basis of the whole tax year. These are discussed in detail in the response.

Experience with the NRCGT regime indicates that lack of awareness of the need to make a return within 30 days will be a significant problem. HMRC will need to undertake an extensive communications campaign to raise awareness of the new regime amongst taxpayers likely to be affected, tax agents and other relevant advisers (including solicitors and licensed conveyancers).

It is essential that before this new regime is introduced, the IT system for dealing with the reporting requirements is in place and has been properly tested by both taxpayers and agents. The very poor experience of the introduction of the Trust Registration Service should not be repeated.

The ICAS response also suggested that HMRC should review the operation of the penalty regime for late returns for both NRCGT and the proposed regime for UK residents. A penalty structure designed largely for annual returns does not appear to be working appropriately for returns due 30 days after the transaction.

Office of Tax Simplification inheritance tax review: call for evidence

The Chancellor of the Exchequer and the Financial Secretary to the Treasury had requested that the OTS carry out a review of a range of aspects of Inheritance Tax and how it functions, to identify simplification opportunities. The OTS called for evidence to inform its review.

The ICAS response supported reform and simplification of IHT in the long term but did not believe that major reform now (particularly to APR and BPR) is desirable or practical, against the backdrop of Brexit. The immediate focus should be on administrative improvements and the simplification of the lifetime gifts regime, which was discussed in detail in the submission. This would facilitate compliance and simplify one area which causes difficulties, without creating uncertainty and unintended consequences.

Wider reform of IHT, particularly significant changes to APR and BPR, should not be considered in isolation because of the interaction with other areas of the tax system and the risk of unintended consequences. ICAS, therefore, supported the OTS call, in its recent Business Lifecycle Report, for “a detailed review of the tax system as it operates on key events in the business lifecycle, to help the UK economy to maximise its opportunities and to make the system clear and simple for companies to understand and use.” This review should include consideration of the two significant IHT reliefs – BPR and APR – and their interaction with other reliefs.

Agricultural policy is a devolved matter. ICAS, therefore, believes that any review of IHT needs to take into consideration land law. Any proposals that may emerge relating to agricultural property relief should also be tested with the agricultural departments of each devolved government. With APR it is important that the policy rationale is set in the context of wider government policy for agriculture.

The role of online platforms in ensuring tax compliance by their users

This was a government call for evidence on the role online platforms could play in tax administration and helping platform users to meet their tax obligations. The ICAS response concentrated on direct tax because there is a separate consultation taking place on a possible split payment mechanism for VAT.

Difficulty accessing the right information is a significant barrier to users of online platforms understanding their tax obligations and complying with them. It is very difficult for non-specialists to locate relevant information on GOV.UK. The existing guidance also needs to be improved and expanded to make it more useful once individuals do locate it.

ICAS sees considerable scope for online platforms to help users by signposting relevant information and providing users with statements of income generated via the platform. However, HMRC would also need to develop its guidance and provide examples to assist users to understand how it applies to their circumstances. Signposting will only be effective if it takes individuals to guidance which helps them to comply.

ICAS does not believe that there is scope for any form of withholding tax to be applied, for direct tax, by online platforms. The UK direct tax system is too complex, and any withholding tax would be likely to prompt a large volume of repayment claims and queries to HMRC.

However, there is scope for voluntary reporting by online platforms, ie where an individual opts to have the platform report their income to HMRC for pre-population into a return. There is also scope for compulsory reporting by online platforms, ie requiring platforms to report information about users to HMRC (in the same way as banks and building societies report interest income). Accurate matching of data would be essential.

Tax abuse and insolvency and extension of the existing security deposit legislation to CT and CIS

These two consultations discussed proposals to tackle those who deliberately do not pay the tax they owe.

The HMRC consultation on Tax Abuse and Insolvency proposed measures to address the small minority of taxpayers who abuse the insolvency regime in trying to avoid or evade tax liabilities (including through phoenixism). The second consultation set out how HMRC intends to implement the government announcement in the Autumn Budget 2017 that it would extend the existing security deposit regime to cover CT and CIS.

ICAS supports the efforts of the Government to take appropriate steps to deter and deal with abuses of insolvency processes and to minimise the tax gap between what is due to HM Revenue & Customs and what is paid. However, it is important that any measures do not undermine the UK rescue culture for financially distressed businesses. A useful meeting was held between ICAS and HMRC officials dealing with the consultation to discuss the proposed actions.

The ICAS response broadly supported one of the two possible approaches proposed: the extension of the transfer of liability to CT. It did not support the use of joint and several liabilities due to concerns around identifying appropriate safeguards and the possible finance funding risk to the business. Transfer of liability could be more effectively targeted, and it would be much easier to include appropriate safeguards.

ICAS does not believe that the measures proposed in the Tax Abuse and Insolvency consultation would generally be appropriate to tackle phoenixism because of the risk of undermining the UK’s rescue culture. Extending the security deposit legislation to CT – proposed in the separate consultation on extending the security deposit legislation to include CT and CIS deductions – could be used more effectively to target abusive phoenixism. The ICAS response to this consultation therefore broadly supported the proposed extension, whilst stressing the need for a targeted approach and also discussing some practical difficulties which could arise because of the nature of CT as a profits-based tax due by reference to accounting periods.

Let ICAS know what you think about tax proposals

ICAS submits responses to many of the tax consultations and calls for evidence issued by the government and the Office of Tax Simplification. It is important that we hear members’ views about proposals the government is putting forward. Some consultations ask for comments on specific questions – others are more general calls for evidence. ICAS responses aim to raise any member concerns but also to make constructive suggestions on how government tax policies can be successfully implemented.

You can find out about open and closed tax consultations (and any resulting legislation) from the government consultation tracker. If you have any comments on open consultations let us know as soon as you can – don’t wait for the deadline for responses!

Corporate IFA regime, offshore time limits and entrepreneurs’ relief – the ICAS point of view

By Susan Cattell, Head of Tax Technical Policy, ICAS

29 June 2018

Have you discovered the ICAS tax community?

By Susan Cattell, Head of Tax Technical Policy, ICAS

28 June 2018

2-23-marsh 2-23-marsh
ICAS logo

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

ICAS logo

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: