ICAS ICAS logo

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Careers support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Finance + Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Business and governance
    5. Charities
    6. Coronavirus
    7. Corporate and financial reporting
    8. Cyber security
    9. Ethics
    10. Insolvency
    11. ICAS Research
    12. Pensions
    13. Practice
    14. Public sector
    15. Sustainability
    16. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD courses and qualifications
    2. CPD news and updates
    3. CPD support and advice
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

Guidance for pension schemes on accounting for Guaranteed Minimum Pension equalisation

  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
By Christine Scott, Head of Charities and Pensions

4 April 2019

Key points:

  • PRAG has published new guidance on ‘Accounting for GMP equalisation by pension schemes following the Lloyds judgement’.

  • The judgement sets out a range of methodologies that the trustees can use to calculate pension scheme obligations.

  • Pension schemes will need to exercise judgement in determining the appropriate accounting treatment for obligations arising from the requirement to equalise the effect of unequal GMPs.

The Pensions Research Accounts Group (PRAG) has published new guidance on ‘Accounting for Guaranteed Minimum Pension (GMP) equalisation by pension schemes following the Lloyds judgement’ (March 2019). The guidance is available on the members’ area of the PRAG website.

The guidance has been prepared:

  • To assist pension schemes assess the impact on their accounts of the High Court judgement, on 26 October 2018, in Lloyds Banking Group Pensions Trustees Limited v Lloyds Bank Plc GMP equalisation case.

  • Makes it clear that each pension scheme will need to exercise judgement and have regard to its scheme rules in determining the appropriate accounting treatment for obligations arising from the requirement to equalise the effect of unequal GMPs accrued between 1990 and 1997.

In summary, pension schemes should recognise a liability in respect of backdated benefits payable and related interest where these can be measured reliably, and the liability is expected to be material.

The Guidance should be read alongside FRS 102: The Financial Reporting Standard Applicable in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland and Financial Reports of Pensions Schemes: A Statement of Recommended Practice (the Pensions SORP (2018)).

Current estimates of obligations relating to the equalisation of GMPs range from 1% of scheme liabilities to 4%. However, obligations could be outside of this range.

What is GMP?

The GMP is the minimum pension which a UK occupational pension scheme has to provide for those employees who were contracted out of the State Earnings Related Pensions Scheme (SERPS) between 6 April 1978 and 5 April 1997.

About the Lloyds judgement

In the Lloyds judgement, the High Court:

  • Ruled that the Lloyds Schemes must equalise for the effect of unequal GMPs accrued between 17 May 1990 and 5 April 1997.
  • Set out a range of methodologies that the trustees can use to calculate scheme obligations.
  • Ruled that back payments are applicable subject to any limitations in the scheme rules, for example in relation to time limits on the back-dating of benefits, with interest applied at 1% of the Bank of England basic rate.

The judgement did not deal with the treatment of transfers out or de-minimis considerations which are expected to be dealt with in a second hearing later this year.

Most pension schemes were required to equalise benefits payable to male and female scheme members as a result of a judgement reached by the European Court of Justice on 17 May 1990 in Barber v Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance Group. The judgement was incorporated into the Pensions Act 1995.

However, subsequent to the Barber case, pension schemes have tended not to equalise differences in benefits as GMPs remained, and still remain unequal in the underlying legislation. The absence of changes to the underlying legislation or sufficient guidance from the UK Government on acceptable methodologies have resulted in this position.

While the October 2018 ruling relates specifically to Lloyds Pension Schemes, it applies to any scheme contracted out between May 1990 and April 1997 and providing GMPs.

Accounting for obligations arising from GMP equalisation

Under FRS 102:21:4, an entity shall recognise a provision only when:

(a) the entity has an obligation at the reporting date as a result of a past event;
(b) it is probable (i.e. more likely than not) that the entity will be required to transfer economic benefits in settlement; and
(c) the amount of the obligation can be estimated reliably.

Schemes are likely to have to exercise judgement in determining the obligating event (FRS 102:21:4(a)) and the measurement of the obligation (FRS 102:21:4(c)).

The guidance points schemes towards the following considerations in arriving at a judgement about these requirements:

  • If the liability is clearly going to be immaterial it will not be necessary to include it in the financial statements although the trustees may do so if they wish, explaining their approach to dealing with the matter in their trustees’ report and the financial statements.

  • The determination of the required GMP equalisation at a member level is complex and will involve detailed analysis of individual member records which current experience suggests will not be available for some time, possibly a number of years. Also whilst the rulings have provided clarification in practice trustees may find further complications in applying the methodologies approved by the High Court. In these circumstances, it is not necessary to calculate the backdated benefits and related interest at a member level for accounting purposes if a reliable estimate can be determined by other methods *[meaning a provision can be recognised rather than an accrual].

  • It is possible that in certain circumstances measurement difficulties could exist which mean trustees cannot reach a reliable estimate, for example, if the trustees and employer had not yet agreed upon the appropriate methodology, significant data issues exist or further significant clarifications are required.

  • Non-recognition of liabilities due to measurement difficulties is normally expected to be rare and very exceptional, see paragraph 3.6.3 of the Pensions SORP. If the trustees conclude that it is too early in their deliberations and decision-making process to determine a reliable estimate and there are grounds to believe the amounts are likely to be material this should be disclosed in the notes to the financial statements (FRS102:2:32) and it would fall to be treated as a contingent liability under FRS 102 (FRS 102:21:12) rather than an accrual or provision. The scheme auditor will consider the implications of this on their auditor’s report.

  • The question arises as from what date this obligation existed as this is relevant to considering whether to treat the ruling as an adjusting or non-adjusting post balance sheet event. One view is that the effective date of the obligation is the date of the ruling *[i.e. the High Court’s judgement in the Lloyds case]. Another view is that trustees always had this obligation which the ruling has confirmed. In either case, the effective date is not when the trustees eventually amend scheme benefits to comply with the ruling. The balance of views emerging from accounting firms is that the effective date for recognising the obligation is the date of the ruling which provides clear guidance as to the measurement methods available.

  • Based on the views described above *[i.e. the obligating event occurred on 26 October 2018, the date of the Lloyds judgement] schemes with year ends before the judgement date where financial statements are approved after the judgement date will disclose the ruling as a non-adjusting post balance sheet event with an estimate of its financial effect or an explanation that such an estimate cannot be made, where the amounts are material.

  • Schemes with year ends after the judgement date will recognise the cost of backdated benefits and related interest in their financial statements where material and where a reliable estimate can be made.

  • For schemes with year ends post 26 October 2018 the cost of backdating benefits and the related interest is recognised in the accounting period in which the date of the ruling falls *[meaning at the date of the obligating event which is either the date of the Lloyds judgement or an earlier date].

*Denotes a clarification of the guidance by ICAS.

Example disclosures

An appendix to the guide provides example narrative disclosures for scheme accounts on the following scenarios:

Pensions schemes with a year ending before 26 October 2018 (described in the guidance as pre-26 October 2018 year-ends)

  • Non-adjusting post balance sheet event, possible to estimate the obligation.
  • Non-adjusting post balance sheet event, not possible to estimate the obligation.
  • Amount immaterial but disclosure of the issue included in the financial statements.

Pension schemes with a year ending on or after 26 October 2018 (described in the guidance as post-26 October year-ends)

  • Reliable estimate available, deemed an accrual.
  • Reliable estimate available, deemed a provision.
  • Not possible to obtain a reliable estimate.

Not period specific

  • Historic transfers out
shutterstock_496524943.jpg

New FRC guidance for pension auditors poses challenges

By Christine Scott, Head of Charities and Pensions

30 June 2017

CDC: the future of UK pensions?

By Christine Scott, Head of Charities and Pensions

23 January 2019

2-23-marsh 2-23-marsh
ICAS logo

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

ICAS logo

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: