ICAS ICAS logo

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Careers support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight series 2022
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Finance + Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Charities
    5. Coronavirus
    6. Corporate and financial reporting
    7. Business and governance
    8. Ethics
    9. Insolvency
    10. ICAS Research
    11. Pensions
    12. Practice
    13. Public sector
    14. Sustainability
    15. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD courses and qualifications
    2. CPD news and updates
    3. CPD support and advice
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

IESBA publishes Exposure Draft on proposed revisions to the Code relating to the definition of engagement team and the independence requirements in the context of group audits

  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
By Ann Buttery, Head of Ethics

21 March 2022

Main points

  • IESBA is seeking views on proposed revisions to its Code of Ethics relating to the definition of engagement team and the independence requirements in the context of group audits.
  • Following the revision of the definition of “engagement team” in ISA 220 (Revised), IESBA now also proposes to define an audit engagement team in the Code as including individuals from non-network component auditor firms and other service providers who perform audit procedures on the engagement.
  • IESBA is also proposing a new Section 405 to the Code to address independence in a Group Audit context.

IESBA proposes revisions to its Code of Ethics relating to the definition of engagement team and the independence requirements in the context of group audits.

The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) is seeking views on proposed revisions to its Code of Ethics in its recently published Exposure Draft ‘Proposed Revisions to the Code Relating to the Definition of Engagement Team and Group Audits’. The comment deadline is 31 May 2022.

In 2020, the IESBA approved a project to review the definition of engagement team and group audit independence considerations in its Code of Ethics.  The objectives were:

  • To align the definition of the term “engagement team” in the Code with the revised definition of the same term in ISA 220 (Revised) while ensuring that the independence requirements in the International Independence Standards (Part 4 of the Code) are clear and appropriate and apply only to those individuals within the scope of the revised definition who must be independent in the context of the audit engagement; and
  • To revise the International Independence Standards so that they are robust, comprehensive, and clear when applied in a group audit context, including with respect to independence for non-network component auditors.

The International Independence Standards (Part 4 of the Code) are set out as follows:

  • Part 4A – Independence for Audit and Review Engagements (Sections 400 to 899).
  • Part 4B – Independence for Assurance Engagements Other than Audit and Review Engagements (Sections 900 to 999).

Auditors undertaking an audit in the UK are required to comply with the requirements of the Financial Reporting Council's Ethical Standard. There is therefore no requirement on auditors undertaking an audit in the UK to also comply with Part 4A of the Code however the FRC closely monitors developments in the IESBA Code.

Some of the main proposals within the Exposure Draft are discussed below.

Proposed revised definition of “engagement team”, “audit team”, “assurance team” and “review team”

The IESBA is proposing changes to the definitions of “engagement team” and the related terms “audit team,” “assurance team” and “review team”.

Proposed definition of “engagement team”

In the extant Code, the definition of “engagement team” is as follows:

“All partners and staff performing the engagement, and any individuals engaged by the firm or a network firm who perform assurance procedures on the engagement. This excludes external experts engaged by the firm or by a network firm.

The term “engagement team” also excludes individuals within the client’s internal audit function who provide direct assistance on an audit engagement when the external auditor complies with the requirements of ISA 610 (Revised 2013), Using the Work of Internal Auditors.”

In considering aligning the definition of engagement team in the Code with the definition in ISA 220 (Revised), the IESBA recognised that the extant definition of engagement team in the Code applies to both audit and other assurance engagements while the definition of engagement team in ISA 220 (Revised) applies only to audit engagements.  As such, the IESBA then referred to the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) Quality Management standard 1 (ISQM 1) which defines “engagement team” as applying to any team performing procedures on an engagement within the scope of ISQM 1 (i.e. an audit, review, other assurance, or related services engagement). The IESBA is therefore proposing to revise the definition of “engagement team” in the Code to align with the more generic definition of engagement team in ISQM 1 as follows (including reference to explanatory guidance to clarify the nature of the various teams in relation to Parts 4A and 4B of the Code):

“All partners and staff performing the engagement, and any other individuals who perform procedures on the engagement, excluding an external expert and internal auditors who provide direct assistance on an engagement.”

In Part 4A, the term 'engagement team' refers to individuals performing audit or review procedures on the audit or review engagement, respectively. This term is further described in paragraph 400.A.

ISA 220 (Revised) provides further guidance on the definition of engagement team in the context of an audit of financial statements.

ISA 620 deals with the auditor’s responsibilities relating to the work of an individual or organization in a field of expertise other than accounting or auditing, when that work is used to assist the auditor in obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence.

ISA 610 (Revised 2013) deals with the auditor’s responsibilities if using the work of internal auditors, including using internal auditors to provide direct assistance on the audit engagement. In Part 4B, the term “engagement team” refers to individuals performing assurance procedures on the assurance engagement.”

The revised definition of the engagement team in ISA 220 (Revised) includes component auditors and service providers. In Part 4A, proposed paragraph 400.A aligns with ISA 220 (Revised) stating that an engagement team for an audit includes individuals from non-network component auditor firms and other service providers who perform audit procedures on the engagement:

“400.A An engagement team includes all partners and staff in the firm who perform audit procedures on the engagement, and any other individuals who perform such procedures who are from:

(a) A network firm; or

(b) A firm that is not a network firm, or another service provider.

For example, an individual from a component auditor firm who performs audit work on the financial information of a component for purposes of a group audit is a member of the engagement team for the group audit.”

Proposed definitions of “audit team,” “assurance team” and “review team”

The IESBA believes that Engagement Quality Reviewers, whose independence plays a vital role in promoting audit quality, should be subject to the same independence requirements regardless of whether they come from within or outside the firm or its network. Similarly, the IESBA believes that individuals who (a) recommend the compensation of, or who provide direct supervisory, management or other oversight of the engagement partner in connection with the performance of the audit engagement, or (b) provide consultation regarding technical or industry-specific issues, transactions or events for the engagement, should be members of the audit team, regardless of whether they come from within the firm.

As such, the IESBA proposes to amend the definitions of “audit team,” “review team,” and “assurance team” by adding the phrase “or engaged by” to subparagraph (b) of those definitions to include all such individuals.

Independence in a Group Audit context

The IESBA approached independence in a Group Audit context from two different perspectives:

(a)Independence principles for individuals involved in the group audit engagement; and

(b)Independence principles for firms, inside and outside of the network, involved in the group audit engagement.

To elaborate on these principles, the IESBA is proposing a new Section 405 (Group Audits) to the Code.

Independence principles for individuals

The change in the definition of engagement team in ISA 220 (Revised) results in a need to clarify the independence requirements for individuals at a component auditor firm outside the group auditor firm’s network and at other service providers.  The IESBA is of the view that the work of the individuals from the non-network component auditor firms contributes to the audit opinion on the group financial statements just as much as the work performed by individuals from the group auditor firm and component auditor firms within the network.

Accordingly, the IESBA is proposing that the same independence provisions that apply to individuals from the group auditor firm and component auditor firms within the network should apply to individuals carrying out audit work at the component level from non-network firms.

The IESBA is therefore proposing a single requirement that all members of the audit team (which includes the engagement team) for the group audit be independent of the group audit client in accordance with the requirements of Part 4A that are applicable to the audit team.

Independence principles for firms

The IESBA notes that no new principles are required for group auditor firms or component auditor firms within the group auditor firm’s network as the extant Code already requires a firm and its network firms to be independent of the audit client. The IESBA makes this explicit by proposing two requirements in proposed Section 405.

Non-network Component Auditor Firms

When deliberating principles for component auditor firms outside the group auditor firm’s network, the IESBA considered the approach in the Code that differentiates the independence provisions applicable to PIEs from those applicable to non-PIEs.

The IESBA is proposing the following independence principles for non-network component auditor firms:

  • First, the component auditor firm needs to be independent of the component audit client, consistent with the independence provisions in Part 4A that apply to a firm with respect to all its audit clients.
  • When the group audit client is a PIE and the component audit client is not itself a PIE, the independence provisions that apply to the component auditor firm in relation to the component audit client are the PIE provisions.
  • When the group audit client is a non-PIE, the independence provisions that apply to the component auditor firm in relation to the component audit client are the non-PIE provisions regardless of whether the component audit client is a PIE.

Financial Interest in the Group Audit Client

The IESBA noted that the extant Code specifically prohibits a firm and its network firms from holding a direct or material indirect financial interest in an entity that controls the audit client, regardless of whether the audit client is a PIE. Given that financial interests by their nature have the greatest potential to create significant threats and the fact that the work performed by non-network component firms forms an integral part of the group audit, the IESBA believes that there should be a similar prohibition for non-network component auditor firms.

Accordingly, the IESBA is proposing to introduce an explicit prohibition on non-network component auditor firms from holding a direct or material indirect financial interest in the entity on whose group financial statements the group auditor firm expresses an opinion in respect of both PIE and non-PIE group audit clients.

Loans and guarantees

The IESBA also came to the view that loans and guarantees are a further area that should be specifically addressed in the proposed Section 405 because of the financial nature of those relationships. Section 511 of the Code addresses loans and guarantees with an audit client. The IESBA considered the scope of application of the prohibitions in Section 511 to a non-network component auditor firm, specifically whether those prohibitions should apply only with respect to the group audit client or whether they should apply also with respect to related entities of the group audit client.

The IESBA considered that the public interest would be better served and the objective of setting proportionate standards better met if the prohibitions in Section 511 on loans and guarantees were to apply only with respect to the group audit client.  For loans and guarantees between the non-network component auditor firm and an intermediate holding entity or any other related entities of the group audit client, the IESBA believes that the conceptual framework provides a robust, principles-based approach to identify, evaluate and address any threats that might be created in such situations.

Non-Assurance Services (NAS)

The IESBA is proposing guidance in Section 405 to highlight some important considerations for non-network component auditor firms in a group audit context when applying the NAS provisions. The IESBA is proposing to make clear that where the group audit client is a PIE, the independence requirements for NAS provided by a non-network component auditor firm to the component audit client are those applicable for PIEs even if the component audit client is a non-PIE.

Breach of Independence by a Component Auditor Firm

The extant Code sets out a process a firm should follow when it concludes that a breach of a requirement of the International Independence Standards has occurred. If a breach is identified at the group auditor firm level, the group auditor firm should follow this process. The IESBA is proposing requirements and guidance in Section 405 to deal with circumstances where a breach is identified at the component auditor firm level.

ICAS Code of Ethics

The ICAS Code of Ethics applies to all members of ICAS, affiliates, students, employees of a member firm or an…

ICAS Ethics Helpline Service

Members with an ethical query can contact us using the following methods.

2022-01-xero 2022-01-xero
ICAS logo

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

ICAS logo

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: