ICAS ICAS logo

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Careers support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Finance + Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Business and governance
    5. Charities
    6. Coronavirus
    7. Corporate and financial reporting
    8. Cyber security
    9. Ethics
    10. Insolvency
    11. ICAS Research
    12. Pensions
    13. Practice
    14. Public sector
    15. Sustainability
    16. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD courses and qualifications
    2. CPD news and updates
    3. CPD support and advice
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

ICAS responds to the IAASB’s discussion paper on fraud and going concern

  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
By James E Barbour CA, Director, Policy Leadership

12 February 2021

Main points

  • ICAS has responded to the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board’s (IAASB) discussion paper ‘Fraud and going concern in an audit of financial statements’.
  • As is noted in the discussion paper the IAASB can increase what it requires of auditors in the areas of fraud and going concern, but it cannot narrow the expectation gap alone.
  • A holistic approach requiring efforts from all of the actors involved in the financial reporting ecosystem is essential if fraud and going concern are to be appropriately addressed.

ICAS response to IAASB discussion paper on fraud and going concern

ICAS has responded to the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board’s (IAASB) discussion paper ‘Fraud and going concern in an audit of financial statements’.

ICAS was supportive of the IAASB for undertaking this initiative in these important areas. However, as is noted in the discussion paper, the IAASB can increase what it requires of auditors in the areas of fraud and going concern, but it cannot narrow the expectation gap alone. The primary responsibility for preventing and detecting fraud rests with directors as it does in relation to assessing whether an entity is entitled to make use of the going concern assumption as the basis for preparing its financial statements.

The IAASB, however, only has direct influence over matters affecting auditors and therefore what can be included in auditing standards or guidance. A holistic approach requiring efforts from all the actors involved in the financial reporting ecosystem is essential if fraud and going concern are to be appropriately addressed. However, issues such as the lack of global standards on corporate governance do bring challenges in that regard.

ICAS highlighted that leadership that promotes an organisational culture of honesty and ethical behaviour is a key element of helping to prevent fraud. ICAS launched its Power of One ethics initiative in 2015 that recognised the importance of ethical leadership. IESBA last year also published its final pronouncement on its Role and Mindset project that requires all professional accountants to adopt an “inquiring mind” and also places emphasis on professional accountants to encourage and promote an ethical culture in their respective organisations. It must be remembered that professional accountants do not just work as auditors but rather in various roles throughout the financial reporting ecosystem. By placing greater focus on their responsibilities, e.g. the inquiring mind and not just accepting information at face value, professional accountants in business will also play a part in mitigating the risk of fraud within organisations.

Additionally, all of those involved in the corporate governance chain, including auditors, should have strong speak-up, listen-up, whistleblow programs in place that both encourage and protect those who make reports. Speak-up lines encourage matters to be flagged at an early stage which can prevent them from escalating into something far more serious.

ICAS also highlighted that a strong focus by management and those charged with governance on having an effective system of internal controls over financial reporting can also play a key part in seeking to mitigate the risk of fraud occurring within an organisation. Therefore, there is merit in jurisdictions considering whether they should impose requirements on directors to attest as to whether the entity concerned does have an effective system of internal control over financial reporting. Consideration would also need to be given to the potential involvement of the auditor, if any, in such attestations.

ICAS also highlighted that the recent approval by the IAASB of its quality management standards and the revisions to ISA 315, which include a more robust and consistent risk identification and assessment, will help to narrow the performance gap. In relation to the use of forensic experts, ICAS is not convinced that this should be mandated on the audits of public interest entities.
However, consideration of their use by auditors in specific circumstances could be more prominently highlighted in the ISAs but their use should be left to the professional judgement of the auditor. ICAS also highlighted that technological advances, including increased usage of data analytics will also help auditors to enhance their respective fraud detection capabilities and further develop professional scepticism.

On going concern, ICAS noted that more could be required of the auditors in the shorter term. However, like fraud, a holistic approach would be preferable with more being required in the first instance of directors. This would then provide a better foundation from which to build additional requirements for the auditor. Some stakeholders clearly believe that an auditor is providing a guarantee as to the continued existence of the audited entity, which can never be the case.

Admittedly, part of the problem lies in the content of the accounting standards which present a low hurdle for an entity to be classed as a going concern, yet there is a high bar for directors having to disclose any “material uncertainties”. There is also a limited awareness of the language of going concern. Merely adding to the obligations on auditors would not address this expectation gap.  
The focus of the IAASB is on going concern. There is evidence that stakeholders are also looking for more information on the long-term viability of a business. That is why we are strongly supportive of the resilience statement approach as recommended by Sir Donald Brydon in the UK. This incorporates and builds on the Going Concern and Viability Statements and would greatly improve transparency and avoid surprise failures (it is impossible to avoid corporate failure completely).

The tiered outlook would address one of the criticisms of the current viability statement regime, whereby corporates may have taken an overly short-term view in their assessments, with a three-year outlook being prominent. However, we would caution that this is a complicated and developing field. The last 12 months have reinforced some of the practical difficulties that boards will encounter trying to predict the speed of change, and the impact of yet unknown future scenarios and external threats.

ICAS issues guidance on going concern considerations for auditors

By Russell Leitch, Senior Audit and Practice Monitoring Reviewer, and James Barbour CA, Director, Policy Leadership

22 December 2020

2022-11-mitigo 2022-11-mitigo
ICAS logo

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

ICAS logo

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: