ICAS ICAS logo

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Careers support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Finance + Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Business and governance
    5. Charities
    6. Coronavirus
    7. Corporate and financial reporting
    8. Cyber security
    9. Ethics
    10. Insolvency
    11. ICAS Research
    12. Pensions
    13. Practice
    14. Public sector
    15. Sustainability
    16. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD courses and qualifications
    2. CPD news and updates
    3. CPD support and advice
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

Monitoring Group publishes recommendations to strengthen the international audit and ethics standard-setting system

  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
James Barbour By James E Barbour, Director, Policy Leadership, ICAS

15 July 2020

Key points:

  • Monitoring Group publishes its recommendations to strengthen the international audit and ethics standard setting system.
  • As at present, there will be two separate standard-setting boards for audit and ethics but there will be enhanced independence from IFAC.
  • There will be an enhanced role for the PIOB including control of the nominations process for appointing board members.

The Monitoring Group (MG) has published its recommendations which are intended to strengthen the international audit-related standard-setting system, including the Public Interest Framework.

The members of the MG are the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, European Commission, Financial Stability Board, International Association of Insurance Supervisors, International Forum of Independent Audit Regulators, International Organization of Securities Commissions and the World Bank Group.

The publication of these recommendations follows on from the MG public consultation on its earlier proposals that were published in November 2017. The MG’s recommendations take on board a number of comments that were made by various stakeholders during the consultation process.

The scope of the recommendations covers the responsibilities of the:

  • International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB);
  • International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA); and
  • Public Interest Oversight Board (PIOB).

The MG’s recommendations focus on the following four areas:

(i) Accountability, public interest oversight and governance

The MG recommends retaining the three-tier model (standard-setting board; PIOB and MG), with the roles and responsibilities of each level clearly delineated and properly balanced, to demonstrate transparency and accountability. The aim of the MG is to provide a formal link between the PIOB and public authorities in order to protect the PIOB from undue influence while also enhancing its public accountability. The MG will periodically review the effectiveness of the system as a whole to address any public concerns and to safeguard the effectiveness of oversight.

The PIOB will provide oversight of the standard-setting process to ensure that international audit-related standards are responsive to the public interest, including that they are developed in accordance with the principles of the Public Interest Framework that has been developed (see below). The PIOB’s remit will retain the direct oversight of the public interest responsiveness of final standards, including through ongoing engagement with the standard-setting boards throughout the standard-setting development cycle. The PIOB’s governance responsibilities will include the nomination and appointment process for board members and overseeing the administration that supports standard setting, including the ethics and conduct criteria for the PIOB, boards and staff.

The PIOB will have ten gender diverse members drawn from a geographically and experientially diverse variety of stakeholder groups, with experience in the preparation, audit, oversight, delivery and use of financial statements. The PIOB Chair will demonstrate significant experience in identifying and understanding: interests of users of financial statements; the regulatory framework in which capital markets operate; and the importance of reliable financial information to transparent markets and thus contributing to promoting financial stability. The PIOB members, including the Chair, will be identified through an open call for nominations with clearly articulated guidelines. The method for appointment will be determined by the MG with consideration of a skills matrix that fosters leadership, expertise, and diversity of thought and geography. PIOB appointments will be made by the MG, consistent with currently established terms of three years, renewable once. The PIOB will assess each board’s effectiveness, including their respective Chairs.

(ii) Purpose, structure, and process of standard setting

International audit-related standard-setting activities will be undertaken in accordance with the Public Interest Framework. The PIOB will be responsible for the governance of the boards and public interest oversight of their agreed responsibilities. The recommendations are written with an over-arching objective that standard-setting activity would be independent from IFAC and that the associated governance and public interest oversight activities will reside within the PIOB Foundation legal entity. For future fundamental changes to the standard-setting structure, the PIOB, IFAC and the MG will sign a Memorandum of Understanding which will set out, among other things, the due process to accomplish any such fundamental future change.

The governance structure will include a separation between the source of funding and the management of the funds, including their allocation to oversight and standard-setting activities.

There will be two separate multi-stakeholder boards. One board would continue to be responsible for setting audit, review, assurance and quality control standards and the other board would continue to be responsible for setting international ethics standards for professional accountants, including auditor independence requirements. In this regard, the boards will retain the current mandates of the IAASB and IESBA, respectively, with continued enhanced coordination essential.

Each board will comprise 16 remunerated members (one full-time independent chair, one part-time vice chair and 14 part-time members), all appointed to act in the public interest. All members will be nominated through an open call and appointed using a skills matrix to be developed for each board that prioritises the public interest and fosters leadership, expertise, and diversity of thought and geography. The boards shall be comprised of a balanced group of individuals drawn from diverse stakeholder groups including for example: investors and other users of the financial statements, accountants, regulatory members, audit committee members, academics in the field of accounting or auditing, and audit practitioners. Each board will be limited to five audit practitioners (an individual who is or has been a member or employee of or otherwise affiliated with a public accounting firm within the last four years, determined at the time of appointment). Appointments will be for three years, renewable once. For each board, a two-thirds majority of all board members is required to vote in favour for the issuance of due process documents, such as an exposure draft, final standard or amendment.

The boards will be supported by an expanded and enhanced technical staff.

The boards will have the ultimate responsibility and accountability for the approval and withdrawal of standards. The PIOB will be responsible for issuing certifications on new or revised standards.

Board meetings will continue to be open and the boards will consider video streaming.

The boards will have access to stakeholder advisory councils reflecting diverse stakeholders including national standard setters.

The adoption and implementation of the standards will be fostered through multiple stakeholders, including IFAC and the PIOB. IFAC will maintain its role in promoting global adoption, convergence, education, implementation and compliance to ensure that professional accountancy organisations comply with their membership obligations, advocacy, non-authoritative guidance, sharing of best practices, surveying for implementation challenges and building capacity of professional accountancy organisations.

(iii) Funding

The MG will continue working for the development of an appropriate, long-term sustainable funding policy. It will seek, recognising that this will take time, to find a structure that encompasses:

  • diversification of contributions from around the world received from investors and other users of financial statements, regulators and the accountancy profession;
  • stability through medium and long-term commitment from contributors and adequate reserves built over time; and
  • prudence and public accountability in the use of funds.

While IFAC continues to fund standard-setting activities and part of PIOB activities, there will be separation between the source of funding and the management of the funds, including their allocation to oversight and standard setting activities (PIOB and the standard-setting boards’ structure).

(iv) Transition

The MG will leverage the support of IFAC and the PIOB, along with input from the standard-setting boards, in developing a transition plan within nine months from the publication of these recommendations (by end of April 2021). The implementation period is not expected to extend beyond a period of three years after the development of the transition plan. It is envisaged that the new structure will enter into a service level agreement with IFAC for necessary support services (for example, nominations, staffing, communications and facilities) provided at fully transparent cost (subject to oversight of PIOB).

Public Interest Framework (PIF)

The PIF has been developed in the context of the MG recommendations  (the MG also recognises it will need to evolve). It sets out the way development and oversight of international audit-related standards are responsive to the public interest and is structured around responses to the following questions:

  • For whom are standards developed?
  • What interests need to be served?
  • How are the interests of users best served?
  • What qualitative characteristics should the standards exhibit?
  • How is the public interest responsiveness of a standard assessed?
  • What special considerations are required for international audit-related standards, given their particular public interest relevance?

While the PIF recognises the importance of all of the above stakeholders, it focuses
primarily on the interests of users, and more specifically on the longer-term interests of creditors and investors and the protection of those interests.

IFAC response

IFAC has stated that it is pleased that the MG paper recognises the important and necessary role that IFAC and the accountancy profession will continue to play in the standard-setting process and that the recommendations are aligned with IFAC’s strategy. It highlights, however, that there are a number of important issues still to be addressed before moving forward with implementation. While IFAC does not underestimate the challenges this presents, it remains confident that the various parties will be able to work collaboratively with all key stakeholders involved to reach a satisfactory resolution during the transition planning phase.

FRC publishes principles for operational separation of the audit practices of the Big Four firms

By James E Barbour, Director, Policy Leadership

7 July 2020

ICAS responds to FRC discussion paper: ‘Technological resources: using technology to enhance audit quality’

By James E Barbour, Director, Policy Leadership, ICAS

9 July 2020

2022-11-mitigo 2022-11-mitigo
ICAS logo

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

ICAS logo

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: