ICAS ICAS logo

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Careers support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Finance + Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Business and governance
    5. Charities
    6. Coronavirus
    7. Corporate and financial reporting
    8. Cyber security
    9. Ethics
    10. Insolvency
    11. ICAS Research
    12. Pensions
    13. Practice
    14. Public sector
    15. Sustainability
    16. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD courses and qualifications
    2. CPD news and updates
    3. CPD support and advice
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

BEIS proposes to introduce Resilience Statements

  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
By James E Barbour CA, Director, Policy Leadership

19 March 2021

Main points:

  • BEIS has published its long-awaited consultation on restoring trust in audit and corporate governance.
  • The Government proposes to introduce Sir Donald Brydon’s recommendation for certain companies to have to produce a Resilience Statement.
  • Initially, this should be required only of premium listed companies, in view of their existing experience of producing viability statements, however, it should be extended to other public interest entities two years later.

This article highlights BEIS proposals in relation to resilience statements.

BEIS has published its long-awaited consultation on restoring trust in audit and corporate governance. The consultation paper runs to 230 pages and the consultation will remain open until 8 July 2021. In one of the key proposals BEIS outlines its support for Sir Donald Brydon’s recommendation for certain companies to have to produce a Resilience Statement.

To which companies will this Resilience Statement proposal apply?

Initially it is proposed that this proposal will only require to premium listed companies as they currently have more extensive experience of risk and viability reporting through disclosures they provide under the UK Corporate Governance Code and the UK Listing Rules.

However, the Government believes that the public interest in resilience reporting extends to other listed and to unlisted companies with a significant economic and social footprint. It therefore intends to extend this requirement to other Public Interest Entities (PIEs) within two years of it coming into force for premium listed companies. This is subject to the possible exclusion of recently listed companies for which the Government is considering whether for a period of time such entities should retain the option of voluntary compliance in order to build investor confidence in their reporting and future prospects.

What will the Resilience Statement comprise?

As per Sir Donald Brydon’s recommendation, the Resilience Statement will cover three time periods. These are as follows:

(i) Short-term
The short-term section of the Statement would incorporate a company’s existing going concern statement, including disclosure of any material uncertainties considered by management during their going concern assessment, which were subsequently determined not to be material after the use of significant judgement and/or the introduction of mitigating action. Such disclosures are currently required under international financial reporting standards in respect of the application of significant judgement, but the Government accepts the Brydon Review proposal that this should be required in the Resilience Statement, including disclosure of uncertainties no longer judged material after mitigating action. The Government believes this has the potential to drive better compliance and more informative reporting in this area.

(ii) Medium-term
The medium-term section of the Statement would incorporate the existing viability statement requirements to provide an assessment of the company’s prospects and resilience, and to address matters which may threaten the company’s ability to continue in operation and meet its financial liabilities as they fall due. In this respect, the Government agrees with the Brydon Review that the mandatory assessment period should be five years, rather than the three year period currently chosen by most companies who produce viability statements. It is also proposed that viability reporting over the medium term should do more to evidence scenario planning by companies and the Government is inviting views on how this could best be achieved in practice. At this stage, the Government intends to require companies to include at least two reverse stress testing scenarios in their Resilience Statement.

(iii) Long-term
The Government proposes that the content in the long-term section of the Resilience Statement should not in general be prescribed. Rather, this should instead set out what the directors of the company consider to be the main long-term challenges to the company and its business model, and how these are being addressed e.g. the impact of long-term changes in demographics, technology, consumer preferences and other identified trends on the company’s long-term business model.

Additional Disclosures

The Government also proposes to require further specific disclosures in both the short and medium-term sections of the Resilience Statement. The existing going concern and viability statements largely leave it to companies’ discretion to determine which specific matters of risk and viability should be considered and reported. Whilst companies should continue to have flexibility to report on resilience matters most relevant and material to their individual business, the Government recognises, that there are resilience issues common to many, if not all, businesses, and that it could be helpful to shareholders and other users to have these addressed specifically in the Resilience Statement.

Such matters might include:

  • threats to liquidity, solvency and business continuity in response to a major disruptive event (such as a pandemic) which disrupts normal trading conditions;
  • supply chain resilience and any other areas of significant business dependency (e.g. on particular markets, products or services);
  • digital security risks (both including external cyber security threats, and the risk of major data breaches arising from internal lapses);
  • the business investment needs of the company to remain productive and viable;
  • the sustainability of the company’s dividend and wider distribution policy; and
  • climate change risk.

Impact of climate change

The Government is seeking views on whether the Resilience Statement as a whole, including the long-term section, should specifically address the impact of climate change on the company’s business model and financial planning. In this respect, views are invited on whether the Resilience Statement could provide a means for companies in future to provide disclosures consistent with the recommendations of the Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), in whole or part.

The TCFD framework encourages companies to report on how they are identifying and managing climate change risks (and opportunities) over the short, medium and long-term, including with reference to their governance, strategy and risk assessment processes. UK companies are not currently required to report according to TCFD recommendations. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has, however, recently introduced a new Listing Rule which requires premium listed companies to set out whether and where they have made disclosures in line with TCFD recommendations, and to explain why they may not have made any such disclosures. The Government has also announced plans to introduce mandatory climate related financial reporting in line with TCFD recommendations for all UK companies above a certain size threshold by 2025, and will consult separately on those proposals.

The TCFD focus on climate related financial disclosures across the short, medium and long term may complement the structure of reporting under the Resilience Statement. The Government is therefore seeking views on whether, and if so how, these two reporting measures might be integrated.

The Government also agrees with the Brydon Review that companies should consider, as part of their Audit and Assurance Policy, whether any independent assurance is required of the Resilience Statement, as well as outlining the company’s internal assurance of the Statement’s content. Any such independent assurance would be in addition to that required by the statutory audit.

Implementation Approach

The Government’s preferred implementation route at this stage is to implement the Resilience Statement through legislation as a new section of the existing Strategic Report, supported by non-statutory guidance to be maintained by Audit Reporting and Governance Authority.

The Government and regulators will consider what consequential changes may be needed to the UK Corporate Governance Code and relevant provisions in the UK Listing Rules to ensure that there is no duplication across the Strategic Report, the Code and the Listing Rules. Any changes to the Listing Rules would be for the FCA to determine and would be subject to separate FCA consultation. The Government will also consider what scope there may be for companies to report existing statutory disclosures on risk within the Resilience Statement.

It’s not just about audit reform. It is time to recalibrate the corporate ecosystem

By Michelle Mullen, ICAS Executive Director of Standards

5 February 2021

BEIS consultation on restoring trust in audit and corporate governance - part one

By James E Barbour CA, Director, Policy Leadership

18 March 2021

2022-11-mitigo 2022-11-mitigo
ICAS logo

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

ICAS logo

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: