ICAS ICAS logo

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Careers support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Finance + Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Business and governance
    5. Charities
    6. Coronavirus
    7. Corporate and financial reporting
    8. Cyber security
    9. Ethics
    10. Insolvency
    11. ICAS Research
    12. Pensions
    13. Practice
    14. Public sector
    15. Sustainability
    16. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD courses and qualifications
    2. CPD news and updates
    3. CPD support and advice
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

Key proposals that relate to companies in the BEIS consultation on restoring trust in audit and corporate governance.– part two

  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
By James E Barbour CA, Director, Policy Leadership

18 March 2021

Main points:

  • BEIS has published its long-awaited consultation on restoring trust in audit and corporate governance.
  • The paper contains the Government’s proposed response to the majority of the recommendations contained in the Kingman, CMA and Brydon reviews.
  • This article focusses on the key proposals that relate specifically to companies.

We look at the key aspects for companies of the BEIS consultation on restoring trust in audit and corporate governance.

BEIS has published its long-awaited consultation on restoring trust in audit and corporate governance. The consultation paper runs to 230 pages and the consultation will remain open until 8 July 2021. The key proposals that relate specifically to companies are set out below.

Public interest entities (PIEs)

PIEs are the focus of most of the proposed new regulatory measures relating to audit, corporate reporting and corporate governance. Two options for expanding the extant PIE definition are set out, both of which would expand it to include the largest private companies. Views are sought on other types of entity that could be included in a new PIE definition, including third sector entities with a public benefit purpose.

Internal controls

Views are sought on the following three options, which are not intended to be mutually exclusive:

(i)company directors should be required to carry out a review of the effectiveness of their company’s internal controls each year and make a statement, as part of the annual report, as to whether they consider them to have operated effectively. The statement should disclose the benchmark system used and explain how the directors have assured themselves that it is appropriate to make the statement;

(ii)the audit report should describe the work the auditor is already required to do to understand the company’s internal control systems to the extent needed to perform the audit, and to state how that work has influenced the audit, but without a formal auditor opinion on the internal controls’ effectiveness being required; and

(iii)the auditor should be required to provide a formal opinion on the directors’ annual attestation about the effectiveness of the company’s internal controls, potentially limited to key internal controls over financial reporting, or a sub-set of that.

The chapter sets out a tentative preferred option which would require a directors’ statement about the effectiveness of the internal controls, but (unlike the US’s approach to internal controls which mandates external auditor attestation in most cases) leave the decision on whether the statement should be assured by an external auditor to the directors, audit committee and shareholders. The preferred option is not, however, intended to shut down discussion of alternatives.

Dividends and capital maintenance

The following reforms are proposed in relation to dividends and capital maintenance:
* companies (the parent company in the case of a group) should disclose the total amount of reserves that are distributable, or – if this is not possible – disclose the “known” distributable reserve, which must be greater than any proposed dividend;
* in the case of a group, the parent company should provide an estimate of distributable reserves across the group; and
* directors should state that any proposed dividend is within known distributable reserves and that payment of the dividend will not, in the directors’ reasonable expectation, threaten the solvency of the company over the next two years.

Resilience statement and audit and assurance policy
Views are sought on the following proposed new reporting requirements for directors of PIEs:

  • an annual Resilience Statement, setting out how directors are assessing the company’s prospects and addressing challenges to its business model over the short, medium and long-term, including risks posed by climate change; and
  • an audit and assurance Policy, describing directors’ approach (over a rolling three year forward look) to seeking internal and external assurance of the information they report to shareholders, including any external assurance planned beyond the scope of the annual statutory audit.

Company directors

Proposals are included to:

  • give the audit regulator investigation and enforcement powers in relation to wrongdoing by directors of PIEs; and
  • strengthen malus and clawback provisions within executive directors’ remuneration arrangements.

The investigation and enforcement powers would apply to breaches of statutory duties relating to corporate reporting and audit of PIEs. They include the power for the regulator to impose more detailed requirements for how directors should meet these duties. The Government is also considering requiring directors to meet certain behavioural standards in fulfilling these duties.

The strengthened malus and clawback arrangements involve the identification of minimum clawback conditions which would apply in all cases and have a minimum two-year application period. These conditions could include clawback for serious misconduct, a material misstatement of results or an error in performance calculations and failures of internal controls and risk management. Subject to consultation responses, the Government proposes to invite the FRC to implement these stronger arrangements through changes to the UK Corporate Governance Code.

Fraud

The Government’s proposals include:

  • new obligations on both auditors and directors relating to the detection and prevention of material fraud.

Supporting documents

The Government has also published an impact assessment, a summary of stakeholder responses to the Government’s initial consultation on the recommendations of CMA’s Market Study, and a summary of how each of the 150-plus recommendations of the Kingman, CMA and Brydon reviews is addressed either by the proposals contained in the consultation document or through action by the Financial Reporting Council.

Just prior to the publication of the BEIS consultation, ICAS published its vision exploring how various recommendations from the reviews might be combined to deliver a tapestry of reform which will recalibrate the corporate ecosystem of UK Public Interest Entity (PIEs). This paper also sets out our thoughts on how ARGA can help rebuild public trust by encouraging higher standards of corporate governance, corporate reporting and audit.

BEIS consultation on restoring trust in audit and corporate governance - part one

By James E Barbour CA, Director, Policy Leadership

18 March 2021

It’s not just about audit reform. It is time to recalibrate the corporate ecosystem

By Michelle Mullen, ICAS Executive Director of Standards

5 February 2021

2022-11-mitigo 2022-11-mitigo
ICAS logo

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

ICAS logo

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: