ICAS ICAS logo

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Careers support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Finance + Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Charities
    5. Coronavirus
    6. Corporate and financial reporting
    7. Business and governance
    8. Ethics
    9. Insolvency
    10. ICAS Research
    11. Pensions
    12. Practice
    13. Public sector
    14. Sustainability
    15. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD courses and qualifications
    2. CPD news and updates
    3. CPD support and advice
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

HMRC ‘nudge' letters: How to respond

  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
By Steve Price, Senior Tax Consultant, Markel Tax

17 September 2021

Steve Price, Senior Tax Consultant at Markel Tax, considers how to respond to HMRC’s Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) and Self-Employment Income Support Scheme (SEISS) ‘nudge’ letters.

Over the past few years HMRC has made increasing use of so-called ‘nudge’ letters to aid its compliance efforts. Letters are issued en-bloc to targeted groups suggesting that taxpayers check certain aspects of their tax affairs and correct them if needed.

Why is the use of ‘nudge’ letters increasing?

The cost of this type of initiative is minimal to HMRC, so even if only a small number of taxpayers respond with amended returns or disclosures, it's still a very cost-effective tool.

It also provides a ready source of future compliance checks within the targeted group, and whilst HMRC may not have the resources to follow-up everyone in that group, those deemed to provide the greatest risk can expect further contact.

Is it best to respond?

The recent spate of CJRS and SEISS ‘nudge’ letters may at first seem to be merely a repeat of earlier campaigns but the consequences of not handling them correctly are potentially much more severe than ever before.

The common view is that it is much better to respond to this type of letter than to simply ignore it. To ignore it is to gamble on whether or not HMRC decides to follow up the initial letter in a given case.

Whilst this may well be the option that some taxpayers would wish to take, they must appreciate that if HMRC does indeed make further contact it will inevitably take a much tougher view of behaviours which will lead to much higher penalties.

Responding to the letter seems to be a simple choice of confirming that errors have been made and correcting them, or alternatively providing confirmation that all is in order. However, both of these options are fraught with danger if not handled correctly; the key being the extent of the checks carried out.

Double-check the original claim

Taxpayers may well believe that because they have already been through the claims process their original claims must be correct, particularly if an agent has dealt with CJRS claims on their behalf or HMRC has indicated that they are eligible to claim the SEISS grant.

The tendency may then be to confirm to HMRC that all is in order without fully checking the original claims or not checking them at all. Even if cursory checks reveal errors that need to be corrected, there may be a view taken not to look any deeper.

The reality is that the CJRS and SEISS schemes were introduced out of urgent necessity with the original legislation, and HMRC’s interpretation of it lacking the detail needed to cover many of the issues arising at the time. This was of course addressed by a constant stream of updates issued over the following months to clarify numerous areas of doubt.

As a consequence, many of the early claims were based on incomplete information and heavy interpretation which in hindsight may not be correct. Many clients relied on their agents to deal with CJRS claims but in those early days agents were struggling along with everyone else to interpret the legislation correctly and were under enormous pressure to lodge huge numbers of claims within a very short timescale. This pressure is likely to have led to errors in some cases, together with the fact that the claims were only as accurate as the information provided by the client in the first place.

There was also a general belief that if individuals were invited by HMRC to claim the SEISS grant then they must have been eligible. However, we now know that this was not the case as those invitations were intended to alert individuals that they may be eligible but individuals actually needed to fully check the eligibility criteria themselves.

All of this contributes to a scenario where many claims made in good faith may not actually be correct. The nudge letters provide an opportunity for claimants to thoroughly check all claims back to March 2020, reflect upon their interpretation of the prevailing conditions/guidelines at the time each claim was made and decide if they are robust enough to withstand the scrutiny of an HMRC compliance check.

How claimants can determine their position

HMRC will take responses to their letters seriously. If claimants confirm that they have reviewed the position and found errors, or alternatively that the original claims are correct, they need to be absolutely certain of their position. That certainty can only be brought about by knowing and evidencing that:

  1. They have thoroughly checked all CJRS claims made themselves by reference to the guidelines in place at the time.
  2. They have thoroughly checked that any information provided to the agent making the claim on their behalf is absolutely correct.
  3. The adviser has thoroughly checked the claims made on their behalf and provided written confirmation of the outcome.
  4. They have thoroughly checked eligibility criteria for all SEISS claims made by reference to the guidelines in place at the time.

If statements are made without this level of checking, HMRC will not be so tolerant of errors found later and will likely invoke much heavier penalties as a result. This will be based on HMRC’s belief that the claimant either couldn’t be bothered to check previous claims despite HMRC’s offer or did check them and found errors which they chose not to report.

The over-riding message must be that anyone receiving this type of ‘nudge’ letter should thoroughly check all previous claims and respond to HMRC as appropriate in order to avoid more serious problems further down the line.


About Markel Tax

Markel Tax is the UK’s largest independent tax consultancy and adviser to the accountancy profession. With the reputation of delivering the highest service standards within the fee protection insurance market, Markel Tax is the trusted partner for over 2,500 UK accountancy practices.


This blog is one of a series of articles from our commercial partners.
The views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of ICAS.

2022-01-xero 2022-01-xero
ICAS logo

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

ICAS logo

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: