ICAS ICAS logo

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Careers support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Finance + Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Charities
    5. Coronavirus
    6. Corporate and financial reporting
    7. Business and governance
    8. Ethics
    9. Insolvency
    10. ICAS Research
    11. Pensions
    12. Practice
    13. Public sector
    14. Sustainability
    15. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD courses and qualifications
    2. CPD news and updates
    3. CPD support and advice
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

Examining the UK Government’s intention to have directors report on the effectiveness of internal controls

  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
James Barbour By James E Barbour CA, Director, Policy Leadership

6 June 2022

On 31 May 2022, the UK Government published its feedback paper to its 2021 White Paper ‘Restoring trust in audit and corporate governance’. James Barbour CA looks at the Government’s intention to have directors of premium listed entities report on the effectiveness of a company’s internal controls.

Whilst there has been considerable commentary on the dilution of the Government’s proposals in this area, ICAS welcomes that the Government does intend to take forward the inclusion of a provision in the UK Corporate Governance Code for directors to report on the effectiveness of an entity’s internal controls. The Government believes that the Code provides a way of testing and refining an approach before making it a stronger legal requirement at a future point if required, and potentially extending it to a wider range of companies. Whilst it currently applies only to premium listed companies, the Government is of the view that it has a wider influence on other codes and best practice principles developed for different types of companies. These include the QCA Corporate Governance Code which is tailored for small and mid-size quoted companies and the Wates Principles, aimed at improving corporate governance in large private companies.

Restoring trust in audit and corporate governance

In its 2021 White Paper, the Government stated that it was minded to enhance the existing requirements on internal controls and set out three options for doing so.

  • Option A: requiring an explicit statement from directors about whether they regard their internal controls to be effective and the basis for that assessment;
  • Option B: requiring the external auditors to say more about the work they already undertake to understand the company’s internal control systems and how that work has influenced the approach taken to the audit – but without requiring a formal attestation of their effectiveness; and
  • Option C: requiring auditors to provide a formal assurance of the directors’ statement about control effectiveness.

The White Paper outlined an “initial preferred option” based on an explicit statement from the directors which was in relation to the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting, leaving the question of whether external assurance should be sought as a voluntary matter for the company (and its shareholders) to determine based on its own circumstances, other than in certain exceptional circumstances. The White Paper stressed that the initial preferred option was not intended to close down consideration of alternatives.

This particular proposal has been the subject of considerable debate as the Government seeks to assess the costs and benefits of such a proposal. So what has the Government decided to do?

Internal controls – the way forward

The Government considers that there would be benefits in strengthening the UK’s internal control framework However, it believes that there are risks in moving directly to putting a directors’ statement on a legislative footing. It has noted the views of a number of respondents to the 2021 consultation, including audit committee chairs, that a legally required directors’ statement might, in practice, lead companies to default to seeking external assurance from their auditors as the safest way of avoiding challenge. There would be a risk that the UK might unintentionally default to an approach very similar to the one in the US where mandatory external assurance is a requirement and combined audit and assurance costs are significantly higher. This from the Government’s perspective could affect the attractiveness of the UK’s public markets as a place to list.

Therefore, the Government will not seek to legislate in this area, but rather, intends to:

  • Invite the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) to consult on strengthening the internal control provisions in the UK Corporate Governance Code to provide for an explicit statement from the board about their view of the effectiveness of the internal control systems (financial, operational and compliance systems) and the basis for that assessment.  The Government believes this is the most practical and proportionate way of strengthening boardroom focus on internal control matters. It will be particularly effective if investors in their stewardship role are ready to apply pressure on boardrooms where internal controls seem to be weak, or where the statements by directors are “boilerplate” or inadequate. Additionally, the intended scope of “internal controls” is wider than just those over financial reporting (see above). The Government expects that this provision would be underpinned with guidance on how boards should approach the preparation of the statement, which would be developed following a review of the FRC’s existing Guidance on Risk Management, Internal Control and Related Financial and Business Reporting. This guidance would cover the identification of acceptable standards, benchmarks or principles and address definitional issues and the circumstances in which external assurance might be considered appropriate. To help prepare the guidance it is envisaged that the FRC will work with companies, investors and auditors.
  • Require Public Interest Entities (PIEs) above the size thresholds of 750 or more employees and £750m or more in annual turnover to state, as part of the proposed “minimum content” for the new Audit and Assurance Policy, whether or not they plan to seek external assurance of the company’s reporting on internal controls. This would not require directors to seek such assurance but would help ensure that they had at least considered the possibility. This would also provide external shareholders with a clear opportunity to raise the matter and press for more assurance if they had concerns; and
  • Ask the FRC to explore with investors and other stakeholders whether and how the content of the auditors’ report could be improved to provide more information about the work auditors have undertaken on the internal controls over financial reporting. This would be limited to observations based on work carried out as part of the statutory audit and would not amount to assurance of the control system. The FRC has agreed to take this forward as part of a consultation on the content of audit reports.

Supporting measures

The new Audit and Assurance Policy will require companies to state whether or not they plan to seek external assurance of the company’s reporting on internal controls. This will provide transparency to investors and other stakeholders and an opportunity, in practice, to raise the issue and press for more assurance if warranted. So too will the provision of more information from the external auditor about the work they undertake to understand and assess the internal controls. The regulator’s stronger corporate reporting review powers to monitor the entire annual report should also help address and deter cases of inadequate reporting.

The Government also intends to proceed with implementation of the White Paper proposal that directors of PIEs above the size thresholds of 750 or more employees and £750m or more in annual turnover should be required to report on the steps they have taken to prevent and detect fraud. This reporting could provide more transparency about internal controls more generally since, whilst the fraud statement would not require them to say anything about the wider internal control system, it would be an obvious opportunity to do so, since an effective system is the best defence against fraud.

Post-implementation review and potential future steps

The Government and the regulator will review the effectiveness of the envisaged Code changes in driving improved standards of internal control and more informative reporting as part of the Post-Implementation Review of the reform package.

They will also consider the extent to which the provisions have been reflected in other codes and best practice principles. The Government will consider at that point whether further measures are needed, and if there would be value in extending the measures to other PIEs. If necessary, new statutory reporting requirements relating to internal controls could be introduced using existing powers in the Companies Act 2006.

Examining the UK Government’s proposals for widening the definition of a public interest entity (PIE)

By James E Barbour CA, Director, Policy Leadership

6 June 2022

Reviewing the UK Government’s feedback to its 2021 ‘Restoring trust in audit and corporate governance’ white paper

By James E Barbour CA, Director, Policy Leadership

31 May 2022

2022-01-xero 2022-01-xero
ICAS logo

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

ICAS logo

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: