ICAS ICAS logo

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Careers support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Finance + Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Business and governance
    5. Charities
    6. Coronavirus
    7. Corporate and financial reporting
    8. Cyber security
    9. Ethics
    10. Insolvency
    11. ICAS Research
    12. Pensions
    13. Practice
    14. Public sector
    15. Sustainability
    16. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD courses and qualifications
    2. CPD news and updates
    3. CPD support and advice
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

Will nations agree on digital tax?

Osaka
  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
Donald-Drysdale By Donald Drysdale for ICAS

2 July 2019

Main points

  • Tax systems need reform to deal better with cross-border digital transactions.
  • There is no consensus yet on the OECD’s two-pillar approach.
  • We may see several jurisdictions imposing DSTs before a global solution is found.

With jurisdictions unable to agree on how to tax cross-border digital transactions, Donald Drysdale asks whether the OECD and G20 will find a global solution by 2020?

Introduction

In two articles last November, I commented first on initiatives by the UK and other countries aimed at taxing the global digital economy. Then I considered how Britain’s proposed new digital services tax (DST) might work.

I spoke of widespread concerns that long-established transfer pricing principles would have to be modified. Tax systems would need to be reformed to deal more effectively with cross-border digital transactions, but there was no consensus on how this should be done.

Many countries and other influential organisations had indicated a strong preference for a coordinated global solution. Others including the UK and EU were considering unilateral action. For example, New Zealand is currently consulting on introducing such a tax.

If a global consensus approach can be reached, it will involve changing the current international rules for taxing business income to allow ‘market countries’ (i.e. those where the customers are based) to impose more tax. This option is currently being discussed by the OECD and the G20.

Inclusive Framework on BEPS

The OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) brings together 129 countries and jurisdictions to collaborate on the implementation of the BEPS Package.

On 31 May the Inclusive Framework published its ‘Programme of Work to Develop a Consensus Solution to the Tax Challenges Arising from the Digitalisation of the Economy’, which it saw as an essential element of a fair and sustainable international tax system.

Programme of Work

The programme sets out proposals grouped into two broad ‘pillars’ which could form the basis for consensus. These pillars involve the re-allocation of taxing rights among jurisdictions and the need to address remaining BEPS issues.

Pillar One would revise the existing nexus rules and allocate greater taxing rights over a multinational’s profits to market countries, even if the enterprise had no physical presence there. One of the following possibilities might emerge, or a different solution perhaps containing some elements of these:

  • A limited proposal for digital services only, focussing on the impact of user participation in social media, digital advertising, multi-sided online platforms and data.
  • A broader proposal – extending beyond the digital economy and applied independently of pre-existing transfer pricing rules – giving greater taxing rights to market countries based on certain marketing intangibles created there by multinationals.
  • An apportionment of a digital multinational’s profit to market countries where it has developed a significant economic presence through technology or other automated means, based on an agreed formula dependent on certain factors such as sales, assets and user participation.
  • An alternative, formulaic approach proposed by pharmaceutical and healthcare company Johnson & Johnson – offering simplicity and certainty by allowing market countries to tax a fixed benchmark return of (say) 3% of a multinational’s sales, perhaps variable depending on certain factors such as overall group profitability and marketing expense.

Pillar Two would be a ‘minimum tax’ measure, applying beyond the digital economy and ensuring that multinationals pay a minimum level of tax on profits earned in low tax countries. This addresses some remaining BEPS issues and is not specifically directed at the digital economy – although it would also apply to digital companies.

The commitment

The OECD has said that these pillars will form the basis for detailed analysis over the next 18 months, as the Inclusive Framework works towards delivering a proposal to the G20 by the end of 2020.

When the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors met in Fukuoka, Japan, on 8 and 9 June, a communiqué issued at the end of their meeting included the following:

“We will continue our cooperation for a globally fair, sustainable, and modern international tax system, and welcome international cooperation to advance pro-growth tax policies. We re-affirm the importance of the worldwide implementation of the G20/OECD [BEPS] package and enhanced tax certainty. We welcome the recent progress on addressing the tax challenges arising from digitalisation and endorse the ambitious work program that consists of a two-pillar approach, developed by the Inclusive Framework on BEPS. We will re-double our efforts for a consensus-based solution with a final report by 2020.”

It would have been reassuring if the above wording had been endorsed by the G20 leaders on conclusion of their summit in Osaka on 29 June. However, other world issues grabbed the headlines.

The timetable

The issues involved in cross-border digital transactions are complex, and the timetable for reaching an international consensus on how they should be taxed is ambitious.

At OECD meetings in 1998 and 2005, it was concluded that the international tax framework that existed at those times was sufficient to address the digital economy.

In 2012 the G20 first resolved to address BEPS issues, and in 2013 the OECD reported that domestic and international rules on the taxation of cross-border profits had not kept pace with changes in business practices brought about by globalisation and digitalisation.

In 2015 the OECD and G20 reported on Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digital Economy as Action 1 of their 15-point BEPS action plan. That document noted problems with taxing the digital economy and considered three possible solutions:

  • Widening the definition of a PE to include a non-physical significant economic presence.
  • A withholding tax on payments to internet companies.
  • An ‘equalisation tax’ – effectively a DST.

No action was taken to adopt any of these possible solutions from the 2015 report, but the OECD and G20 committed to reporting by 2020 on the outcome of continued work in relation to the digital economy.

The pace of change accelerated, and in 2018 a further Interim Report was published, noting important advances in the way business models and value creation were being affected by the process of digitalisation. However, there was no consensus for interim tax measures.

Given the slow progress at the OECD, some jurisdictions are now pursuing unilateral solutions, but these may impose unwanted short-term compliance burdens on companies when the greater need is for global action on digital tax matters.

The UK plans to introduce a 2% DST from April 2020. Austria, Czechia, France, India, Italy, New Zealand and Spain have also enacted or announced DSTs. The European Commission has proposed a DST, but this is not yet supported by all member states.

With the possible exception of India, all the above DSTs are intended as interim measures which would be repealed once the OECD’s global solution has been achieved. But they reflect the fact that the jurisdictions in question are sceptical of the OECD’s ability to deliver its solution within a reasonable timeframe.

For now, this scepticism seems justified. Before a global solution is found, it is likely that we will see an increase in the number of individual jurisdictions imposing unilateral DSTs.

Article supplied by Taxing Words Ltd

2-23-marsh 2-23-marsh
ICAS logo

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

ICAS logo

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: