ICAS ICAS logo

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Careers support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Finance + Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Business and governance
    5. Charities
    6. Coronavirus
    7. Corporate and financial reporting
    8. Cyber security
    9. Ethics
    10. Insolvency
    11. ICAS Research
    12. Pensions
    13. Practice
    14. Public sector
    15. Sustainability
    16. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD courses and qualifications
    2. CPD news and updates
    3. CPD support and advice
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

VAT: Entitlement to deduct

  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
By Jan Garioch, CA

26 April 2019

Main Points

  • HMRC tried to deny VAT recovery to a company on legal fees defending its sole director.

  • The spotlight falls on establishing a direct and immediate link.

  • The case went all the way to the Court of Appeal where it failed to produce a unanimous verdict.

Jan Garioch CA discusses a recent case involving a dispute between HMRC and a company over VAT recovery on legal fees relating to the defence of civil proceedings brought against a sole director.

Praesto Consulting Limited v HMRC concerns input VAT deduction regarding legal fees relating to the defence of civil proceedings brought against that company’s sole director, Mr Ranson. Initially, he was employed by Customer Systems plc (CSP), an IT consultancy. He subsequently resigned in order to become sole director of Praesto Consulting UK Ltd (Praesto), which was a competitor to CSP and employed three others who had also resigned as CSP employees.

CSP issued proceedings against Mr Ranson but not Praesto. It contended that Mr Ranson breached terms of employment in setting up Praesto to compete with CSP and claimed damages.

The High Court trial

In 2011, the case went to trial at the High Court. It is pertinent to the subsequent VAT case that at the outset of the trial the judge raised the issue of CSP’s hope of making a claim on Praesto’s profits in light of the fact that Praesto was not a party. CSP's counsel stated that in the event that it was found that Mr Ranson owed a fiduciary duty and was in breach of that duty then CSP was likely to seek to join Praesto in relation to the claim. The result of the case was that initially the High Court held against Mr Ranson, but his appeal was allowed at the Court of Appeal.

The VAT issues arose when Sintons, solicitors who acted for Mr Ranson and Praesto, issued nine invoices and Praesto reclaimed the VAT involved. The first invoice, which covered costs up to the point that proceedings commenced, was not disputed by HMRC. However, they raised an assessment for the input tax credit of £79,932 claimed for the remaining eight invoices which had all been addressed to Mr Ranson.

That assessment was appealed to the First Tier Tribunal which considered two questions:

  1. Do the invoices relate to services provided by Sintons to Praesto?
  2. If so, do the services have a direct and immediate link to Praesto’s taxable activities? It answered yes to both.

On question 1 it reasoned that CSP would have sought to join Praesto as a party if it succeeded in showing Mr Rankin breached a fiduciary duty. On question 2 it reasoned that Praesto had a direct interest in the appeal being dismissed to avoid it having to account for its profits made in competition to CSP.

The legal rollercoaster continued when HMRC appealed to the Upper Tribunal. It allowed HMRC’s appeal. Its reasoning was that FTT had made an error in approach by failing to find if Praesto was contractually entitled to legal services provided by Sintons. Moreover, even if the services were provided to Praesto, they were not used by it for the purposes of its business.

A majority verdict

The legal battle rolled on further when permission was given to appeal the Upper Tribunal decision to the Court of Appeal.  In March 2019, by a majority verdict, it overturned the Upper Tribunal judgement. The majority judgement was that Sintons made supplies to Praesto on the following reasoning; Mr Ranson instructed throughout on behalf of himself and Praesto, Sintons acted on behalf of both, all work done was on behalf of both and both were jointly liable for the fee.

As a matter of economic reality, there were good reasons for the FTT to consider that throughout Praesto was a main target of the litigation. There was also a majority judgement that the services supplied by Sintons had a direct and immediate link to Praesto’s taxable activities. The consequence of finding a liability on the part of Mr Ranson would have produced a real risk that consequential proceedings brought against the company would severely impact the company's taxable activities or put it out of business.

Entitlement to VAT credit

For those who enjoy the game of predicting the outcome on cases before reading the full judgement, no doubt some will have anticipated the judgement would go the other way. Therefore, it is of interest that there was a dissenting view. The view of Sir Terence Etherton was that entitlement to VAT credit depended upon three things.

Firstly, there must be a direct and immediate link between an input transaction and one or more output transactions, or secondly, they must be part of general costs and have a direct and immediate link with the economic activity as a whole. Thirdly the direct and immediate link must be established objectively as set out by the ECJ in Finanzamt Koln-Nord v Becker EU:C:2013:99 (C-104/12).

Praesto did not contend that there was any direct link between the supply of services in the invoices addressed to Mr Ranson and one or more particular output transactions of Praesto. Nor could Sir Terence be satisfied that, objectively, there was a direct and immediate link between the supply of the solicitor services and Praesto's economic activity as a whole.

There would have been such a direct and immediate link if Praesto itself had been sued, but that did not happen. The fact that the board of directors of Praesto may have thought subjectively that it would be generally in Praesto's best future economic interests if the claim against Mr Ranson failed did not satisfy the condition of an objective direct and immediate link. Therefore, Sir Terence would have dismissed the appeal.

2022-11-mitigo 2022-11-mitigo
ICAS logo

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

ICAS logo

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: