ICAS ICAS logo

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Careers support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Finance + Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Charities
    5. Coronavirus
    6. Corporate and financial reporting
    7. Business and governance
    8. Ethics
    9. Insolvency
    10. ICAS Research
    11. Pensions
    12. Practice
    13. Public sector
    14. Sustainability
    15. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD courses and qualifications
    2. CPD news and updates
    3. CPD support and advice
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

Too good to be true - when complex arrangements are really just good-old employment income in disguise

  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
Justine Riccomini By Justine Riccomini, Head of Tax (Employment and Devolved taxes)

5 April 2022

Main points

  • In the Jones Bros. Ruthin case, the question was whether bonuses paid under ‘contracts for differences’ were governed by Part 7 of ITEPA 2003.
  • They were found not to be, but the cash received was deemed to be employment income anyway.
  • The case serves as a reminder to look confidently through the layers of complication and determine the true nature of an item.

Justine Riccomini explains why it is important for employment tax practitioners to “look through” what appears to be a complex arrangement and see it for what it really is – in this case, a way of paying cash bonuses to employees.

Background

In Jones Bros Ruthin (Civil Engineering) Co Ltd and Britannia Hotels Ltd v HMRC [2022] TC08378, two cases with similar fact patterns were heard under this First Tier Tribunal case reference – and the decision resulted in the same outcome for both appellants.

Both businesses were running a tax avoidance scheme the purpose of which was to avoid PAYE and NICs on bonus payments and instead apply Capital Gains Tax to the profits of the arrangement.  The question to be determined by the Tribunal was to establish whether or not the use of Contracts for Difference (CFD) in a remuneration planning scheme was governed by the Employment-related securities legislation at Part 7 of ITEPA 2003, or not.

Mutton dressed as lamb?

The complex nature of the arrangements needed to be unpicked so that the Tribunal could determine what was actually happening – were the employees receiving a return on a commercial investment, in which case Capital Gains Tax applied, or a good old-fashioned bonus, taxable in the bog-standard way by virtue of S.62 ITEPA 2003 – a bonus which should simply be payrolled and subject to PAYE and NICs as earnings?

HMRC produced a Spotlight paper in February 2016 on the very concept of why they consider CFD do not work, called “Spotlight 28: Employee Bonus Schemes - Growth Securities Ownership Plan and other avoidance schemes based on contracts for difference”.

What were the arrangements in these two cases?

Under the arrangements, Contracts for Difference were used facilitate:

  • A minimal upfront payment by the employee for the CFD to be put in place;
  • The employee was contracted under the CFD to pay the employer if there was a specified monetary difference in the profits as reported as opposed to those which had been forecast;
  • If the profits exceeded a specific level, the employee would receive a payment.

What happened after HMRC reviewed the arrangements?


HMRC concluded that the payments were earnings under a bonus scheme and were not governed by the employment-related securities legislation which would potentially exempt them from being subject to PAYE and NICs as employment earnings. They issued Regulation 80 PAYE assessments on the basis that the CFD did not represent an arm’s length commercial investment-style arrangement, and the employers appealed to the FTT.

What was the FTT’s decision?

Having considered and followed the Supreme Court decision in UBS AG v HMRC [2016] UKCS 13, which concerned itself with a scheme for paying bankers’ bonuses and applied the Ramsay Principle to the fact pattern to take a purposive approach to interpreting the law, the FTT concluded that the ‘only purpose’ of the CFD was… ‘to bring the arrangements within the legislation to obtain the tax benefit’.

The FTT went on to quote the definition supplied by the European Securities and Markets Authority of a CFD insofar as it relates to commercial arrangements:

‘A CFD is an agreement ... to exchange the difference between the current price of an underlying asset (shares, currencies, commodities, indices, etc.) and its price when the contract is closed. CFDs are leveraged products. They offer exposure to the markets while requiring you to only put down a small margin (“deposit”) of the total value of the trade. They allow investors to take advantage of prices moving up (by taking “long positions”) or prices moving down (by taking “short positions”) on underlying assets. When the contract is closed you will receive or pay the difference between the closing value and the opening value of the CFD and/or the underlying asset(s).’

The scheme was deemed to fail to fall under the Employment-related securities legislation because:

  • There was no commercial objective;
  • Whilst the scheme was designed to characterise CFD, there was virtually no chance the employees would make a loss due to the nature of the arrangements in place – so they would instead be highly likely to receive a cash bonus;
  • As such, the payments represented employment earnings and should be subjected to Income Tax and NICs in the usual way.

Conclusion

It is interesting to see the outcome of cases which are considered in a purposive way by the courts to reveal what the facts are telling them about what is really going on to reach an equitable and well-founded conclusion.

In other words, dear reader: if something looks too good to be true, it probably is.


If you wish to contribute to the debate…why not contact the ICAS tax team and Tell ICAS how practical issues relating to HMRC business are affecting your day to day work, for good …or for bad!

Tax-free childcare proves more taxing than first thought

By Justine Riccomini

1 March 2022

Smith strikes again as Court of Appeal overturns previous decisions on holiday pay

By Justine Riccomini, Head of Taxation (Scottish Taxes, Employment and ICAS Tax Community)

9 March 2022

2-23-marsh 2-23-marsh
ICAS logo

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

ICAS logo

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: