ICAS

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
    2. ICAS Strategy 2030
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Career support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
    5. Learning redefined
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Business and governance
    5. Charities
    6. Coronavirus
    7. Corporate and financial reporting
    8. Cyber security
    9. Ethics
    10. Insolvency
    11. ICAS Research
    12. Pensions
    13. Practice
    14. Public sector
    15. Sustainability
    16. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD - Everything you need to know
    2. CPD courses and qualifications
    3. CPD news and updates
    4. CPD support and advice
    5. Career support
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

The importance of finding a good tax agent: a cautionary tale

One-to-One-Meeting
  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
By Susan Cattell, Head of Tax Technical Policy

23 August 2019

Main Points:

  • Personal penalty assessments raised on a company director
  • Adviser did not appeal
  • Upper Tier Tribunal has now refused to permit late appeals to be heard

Susan Cattell considers the latest ruling in a case which illustrates the importance of finding a good tax agent and raises questions about the provision of tax services.

Provision of tax advice and services

It can be difficult for a taxpayer to choose a tax agent or adviser. In the UK there is no restriction on the provision of tax services – anyone can offer them. Members of professional bodies like ICAS, the CIOT and the ICAEW must meet certain standards (including having adequate professional indemnity insurance); if they fall short a client can complain to the relevant body and disciplinary action can be taken where appropriate. However, there is no requirement to belong to a professional body before offering tax services.

HMRC does produce a ‘standard for agents’ which applies to all tax agents dealing with HMRC and to any professional who advises or acts on behalf of others in relation to their tax affairs. The aim is to clarify what is expected of agents, particularly those who are not members of professional bodies. However, HMRC does not regulate agents and the main sanctions it can apply are to report agents to their professional bodies, refuse to deal with an agent or suspend the access of an agent to certain online services. In appropriate cases, it can also pursue criminal cases and apply civil penalties where tax agents are found to have been dishonest.

Even where HMRC can apply sanctions these may come too late for the client to avoid problems. The consequences of choosing a poor agent can be severe, as illustrated by a case recently heard by the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery).

The background

Mr Katib was the director of MDM Global Limited (“MDM”). The company registered for VAT and filed VAT returns. HMRC disallowed claims for input tax and raised assessments based on gross turnover.  MDM did not pay the VAT and after it became insolvent personal penalty notices eventually amounting to approximately £490,000 were served on Mr Katib.

The first personal penalty notice was served in December 2014 at which point Mr Katib appointed a new adviser (Mr B) who acted for him until July 2016.  Mr Katib did not understand the personal assessments, or other documents sent to him by HMRC relating to MDM, so he gave them to Mr B to deal with, paying him £500 per month to represent him and MDM. Mr B apparently assured him on numerous occasions that he was experienced in dealing with tax matters of this type and that everything was in hand.  He declined to show Mr Katib copies of his correspondence with HMRC on the basis of confidentiality.

Late appeals

The First Tier Tribunal (FTT) noted that Mr B failed to appeal against any of the notices of assessment of VAT or penalties relating to MDM, or against the personal penalty notices served on Mr Katib – and that he operated in an unusual way.

According to the Tribunal judgment Mr B’s advice included telling Mr Katib that he should “cease to be a man by making a declaration to that effect to enable [Mr B] to communicate to the world that [he] was dead, that there was plenty of time to deal with an enforcement notice as the Bills of Exchange Act governed the counting of the time limit to do so [and] that [he] erect a poster in his home denying access to all persons which was intended to prevent access by officials/bailiffs to avoid loss of personal assets.”

Eventually, enforcement action was threatened against Mr Katib and in July 2016 he appointed a firm of solicitors – which lodged late appeals against the personal penalty assessments. The FTT was asked to rule on whether Mr Katib should be permitted to make these late appeals.

First Tier Tribunal decision

The FTT decided in favour of Mr Katib. Whilst the delay in appealing was serious the Tribunal noted that Mr Katib had no competence to deal with the various HMRC notices and found that he had been misled by Mr B as to what steps were being taken and needed to be taken. It also found that the delay in making the appeals was caused by Mr B’s inactivity and misleading information given by him to Mr Katib. The new advisers made the appeals as expeditiously as possible after their appointment.

The FTT felt there would be demonstrable injustice if permission to appeal was not granted. The aggregate value of the personal penalties exceeded the value of Mr Katib’s only asset, his home. HMRC accepted that there would be prejudice to Mr Katib but argued that he had brought this on his own head.  The Tribunal disagreed – he had appointed Mr B to represent him, but he did not do so effectively. As the Tribunal put it: “on the contrary [Mr B's] actions or inactions were so extraordinary, so out of the scope of any brief that could have been delivered to any putative representative, that those actions cannot in all conscience be visited upon [Mr Katib].”

Decision reversed by the Upper Tribunal (UTT)

Unfortunately for Mr Katib, HMRC appealed against the FTT decision and the UTT has now refused permission to make the late appeals. For Mr Katib, it seems that this could result in the loss of his house without the opportunity to present a case against the penalty notices to an independent tribunal.

The UTT decided that the FTT had made an error of law in failing to acknowledge or give proper force to the position that, as a matter of principle, the need for statutory time limits to be respected was of particular importance to the exercise of its discretion. The UTT then proceeded to remake the decision, applying the principles set out in William Martland v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs.

The delay in appealing against the notices was at least 13½ months which the UTT considered was “serious and significant”. The UTT also felt that because of the importance of complying with statutory time limits, when considering applications for permission to make a late appeal, failures by a litigant’s adviser should generally be treated as failures by the litigant. However, exceptions to this general rule are possible, so the UTT went on to consider whether such an exception should be made in this case.

It concluded that no departure from the general rule was justified. It was clear that Mr Katib had been misled by Mr B and had not been competently advised – but extraordinary though some of Mr B’s correspondence was the core complaint was that he did not do his job. The UTT observed that this was “unfortunately, not as uncommon as it should be” and went on to say: “It may be that the nature of the incompetence is rather more striking, if not spectacular than one normally sees, but that makes no difference in these circumstances. It cannot be the case that a greater degree of adviser incompetence improves one’s chances of an appeal, either by enabling the client to distance himself from the activity or otherwise.”

Questions raised

It is not clear from the Tribunal decisions how or why Mr Katib came to appoint Mr B as his agent – and Mr B played no part in the case, so his perspective is missing. However, the case raises interesting questions about the regulation of the provision of tax services. Is it sensible that anyone can offer to provide tax services and advice?

Tax is complex, so it may be difficult for ordinary taxpayers to work out whether an agent is taking the right actions on their behalf or giving the correct advice. By the time problems become obvious, and before any sanctions could potentially be imposed by HMRC, the taxpayer may be facing serious tax consequences.

Regulatory change is unlikely in the short term, so, for now, taxpayers need to think carefully and undertake some research when selecting a tax agent or adviser. A good agent will add value for their clients and is likely to be well qualified, regulated and committed to high ethical standards. Taxpayers should make sure they ask prospective agents some detailed questions before they appoint one.

A good starting point for taxpayers looking for help would be the websites of any of the seven professional bodies which require members to adhere to the principles and standards set out in Professional Conduct in Relation to Taxation (PCRT). Most have searchable databases of their practising members, including ICAS.

Professional Conduct in relation to Taxation

Professional Conduct in Relation to Taxation has been updated making it easier to navigate with a new digital structure.

2023-05-newbrand 2023-05-newbrand

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: