ICAS ICAS logo

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Careers support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Finance + Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Business and governance
    5. Charities
    6. Coronavirus
    7. Corporate and financial reporting
    8. Cyber security
    9. Ethics
    10. Insolvency
    11. ICAS Research
    12. Pensions
    13. Practice
    14. Public sector
    15. Sustainability
    16. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD courses and qualifications
    2. CPD news and updates
    3. CPD support and advice
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

The UK tax gap: A variety of views

  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
Donald-Drysdale By Donald Drysdale for ICAS

15 August 2019

Key points:

  • In ‘Measuring tax gaps’ (MTG), HMRC report that their estimate of the UK’s annual tax gap remains at £35 billion.

  • Trends show significant reductions in certain component tax gaps over 12 years.

  • The UK Statistics Authority has reported on ways MTG might be reinforced.

HMRC’s estimates of the UK tax gap never cease to attract controversy, and Donald Drysdale believes that public debate on their accuracy should be encouraged.

Tax gaps

Once again HMRC have published their annual report on Measuring tax gaps (MTG). This has estimated the total UK tax gap for the fiscal year 2017/18 at £35 billion – scarcely unchanged from any year since 2005/06.

The total tax gap, and its component parts, are differences between the amounts of tax collected and those which should have been collected.

The statistics published each year in MTG are simply HMRC’s estimates of those differences, based on internal and external data and various analytical techniques.

Trends

As MTG is an annual publication, one may examine movements each year in the total tax gap and in components attributable to different taxes or taxpayer behaviours. It is also instructive to look at some of the longer-term trends.

While the total tax gap has remained within a relatively narrow band in monetary terms, it fell to 5.6% of total theoretical tax liabilities in 2017/18 – down from 7.2% in 2005/06. In other words, HMRC secured 94.4% of all tax due in 2017/18 – up from 92.8% in 2005/06.

In 2017/18 the combined tax gap for income tax, national insurance contributions and capital gains tax was 3.9% and, at £12.9 billion, represented the biggest share of the total tax gap by type of tax.

Over the past 12 years there have been significant reductions in certain component tax gaps when expressed in percentage terms.

For example, the tax gap attributed to avoidance was down to £1.8 billion in 2017/18 (£4.9 billion in 2005/06). Its main components were corporation tax of £1 billion (down from £2.8 billion), and income tax, NICs and CGT of £0.6 billion (down from £1.5 billion).

Over the same 12-year period, the VAT tax gap was cut to 9.1% in 2017/18 (12.2% in 2005/06); the duty-only excise tax gap was reduced to 5.1% in 2017/18 (8.4% in 2005/06); and the corporation tax gap was down to 8.1% in 2017/18 (12.5% in 2005/06).

IMF

Every now and then we get a view of MTG from a different perspective. In 2013 a team from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) published a report assessing HMRC’s tax gap analysis programme and providing advice and guidance on improving it.

The IMF report addressed HMRC’s methodologies, their approach to disseminating the results, and the way the results were used. It concluded that the programme was comprehensive in tax coverage and produced one of the most far-reaching studies of tax gap estimates globally.

It approved of HMRC’s use of ‘bottom-up’ based estimates for direct tax gaps and ‘top-down’ estimates for indirect tax gaps. It found the models and methodologies used were sound, and consistent with the general approaches used by other countries.

The IMF report suggested some possible improvements to HMRC’s approach – including top-down models for the income tax gaps, extending existing models to assess the size of the policy gap by tax type, and comparing different types of VAT gap model.

The report also made 14 key recommendations to further enhance the robustness of HMRC’s programme. These focused on separate aspects of defining, measuring, reporting and using the tax gap.

NAO

In December 2015 the National Audit Office (NAO) published a report entitled ‘Tackling tax fraud’. This looked at how HMRC responded to particular behaviours – the hidden economy, criminal attacks and tax evasion.

The report considered the UK tax gap (also described as non-compliance) which was then estimated at £34 billion for 2013/14. It attributed nearly half of this (£16 billion) to tax fraud – quantifying components as the hidden economy (£6.2 billion), criminal attacks (£5.1 billion) and evasion (£4.4 billion).

The NAO drew a clear distinction between tax fraud and tax avoidance. It emphasised that avoidance involved acting within the letter but not the spirit of the law, and that tax avoiders were often found to have misused tax rules but their actions were not normally illegal.

The report acknowledged that the tax gap was only an estimate, based on the best data available on the amount of tax lost, including tax fraud. The losses attributed to the hidden economy, criminal attacks and evasion had fluctuated from year to year but the overall trend in tax fraud was flat.

IFS

In October 2017 the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) published a briefing note using data from HMRC’s tax investigations programme between 1999 and 2009.

This showed which types of people were more likely to be under-reporting taxes and how their behaviour changed after a tax audit.

Other commentators

Other commentators have suggested alternative sums for the UK tax gap.

Professor Richard Murphy of Tax Research UK has published a blog arguing that the true level of the UK tax gap for 2017/18 is around £90 billion. He sees MTG as unwarranted self-praise by HMRC, and calls for the tax authority to be more efficient and better resourced.

A press release from Tax Watch UK, an investigative think tank, has described as highly dubious HMRC’s claim that the UK has the lowest tax gap in the world – particularly as HMRC say they are the only tax authority in the world to publish an annual estimate of the tax gap covering a comprehensive range of taxes.

UKSA

In May 2019 the UK Statistics Authority published a report on MTG and whether it complies with the UK’s code of practice for the production and release of official statistics.

UKSA praised MTG for informing the national discussion around tax fairness and tax compliance, noting that HMRC’s leadership of the measurement of tax gaps was cited by the IMF and the NAO.

It also suggested that MTG might be reinforced, or used more effectively, by:

  • showcasing the statistics to emphasise to stakeholders, commentators and users that HMRC are world-leading in measuring tax gaps and are setting the bar for others to follow;
  • testing whether more nuanced reporting of tax gaps, in line with IMF proposals, could widen the uses of the statistics and offer new insights into the effectiveness of the UK tax system;
  • asking whether HMRC’s continuing use of US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) research methodology in some estimates represents international good practice – or whether more robust estimates of UK tax gaps might be produced in other ways;
  • questioning whether HMRC’s assumptions about under-reporting of alcohol consumption continue to represent established professional consensus;
  • linking MTG to tax gap research undertaken by the IFS and to the research capabilities of HMRC’s datalab;
  • exploring possibilities for enhancing the public value of MTG by widening engagement beyond HMRC staff; and
  • providing comparisons and interpretations of tax gaps statistics and data, to better help users by helping them judge the prospects for future tax raising.

Conclusion

The tax gap will always exist, and tax fraud will always be part of the picture. Estimating tax lost will never be a precise art, and there will continue to be a variety of differing views on the accuracy of HMRC’s estimates. Open, public debate on these topics should be encouraged.

Article supplied by Taxing Words Ltd

2-23-marsh 2-23-marsh
ICAS logo

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

ICAS logo

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: