ICAS ICAS logo

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Careers support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Finance + Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Business and governance
    5. Charities
    6. Coronavirus
    7. Corporate and financial reporting
    8. Cyber security
    9. Ethics
    10. Insolvency
    11. ICAS Research
    12. Pensions
    13. Practice
    14. Public sector
    15. Sustainability
    16. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD courses and qualifications
    2. CPD news and updates
    3. CPD support and advice
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

Simplifying tax on key life events

  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
Donald-Drysdale By Donald Drysdale for ICAS

14 November 2019

Main points

  • ‘Net pay’ pension schemes may provide less tax relief than ‘relief at source’ schemes.
  • This applies particularly to Scottish taxpayers with a marginal income tax rate of 19%.
  • The high income child benefit charge is notorious for its complexity.

Donald Drysdale studies the new OTS report on life events, and finds that Scottish taxpayers in ‘net pay’ pension schemes may be disadvantaged.

Life events

In October the Office of Tax Simplification (OTS) published a policy paper entitled OTS Life Events review: Simplifying tax for individuals. Its stated aim was to look at ways to improve people's experience of the tax system at key events in their lives.

The report makes 15 recommendations to help tackle complex tax issues that can arise in relation to events such as having children, entering work, saving for or drawing a pension, and helping others who need support.

While addressing a wide range of subjects, the report highlights three particular topics for special attention: pension reliefs and pension charges; the high income child benefit charge (HICBC); and tax education.

Pension contributions

The OTS recognises that the pensions savings landscape is complex, and regards it as inevitable that the tax issues arising will reflect this. However, the report identifies some specific tax rules which significantly add to the complexity.

Employers can choose between ‘net pay’ or ‘relief at source’ arrangements when providing pensions for their employees. This choice affects the operation of income tax but makes no difference in relation to national insurance contributions (NICs).

For employees with total income below the personal allowance, this choice makes a difference to their net pay packet, because ‘relief at source’ arrangements enable the pension savings to be topped up by ‘tax relief’ even where the individual doesn’t pay income tax.

By contrast, ‘net pay’ arrangements are administratively easier, allowing the full income tax relief to be allowed when deducting tax under PAYE, but they provide no ‘top up’ in cases where the employee has insufficient income to pay income tax.

The overall effect is that, when gross pay is at or below the personal allowance, people saving the same amount into their pension end up in different positions. Those in ‘net pay’ schemes have to fund it all, while those in ‘relief at source’ schemes gain from the relief from the exchequer.

The latest figures available, for 2016/17, show that this difference works to the detriment of 1.1 million individuals out of the 2.4 million workplace pension savers who have income less than the personal allowance.

Many employers choose ‘net pay’ schemes to simplify administration – they don’t have to claim tax relief from HMRC, and the employee automatically receives tax relief. However, it seems unfair that the employee’s relief can be lower in this instance.

The OTS suggests equalising the outcomes between ‘net pay’ and ‘relief at source’ schemes for people with income below the personal allowance. It also wants HMRC to improve their guidance on the tax consequences of particular pension arrangements, and review arrangements for the annual and lifetime allowances.

HMRC should also improve the explanatory notes they provide with tax coding notices when people first receive the state pension, or another pension, and when special ‘K-codes’ are applied to other sources of income within PAYE.

A Scottish dimension

Another difference between ‘net pay’ and ‘relief at source’ schemes affects Scottish taxpayers, who pay income tax on their non-savings, non-dividend income at rates set by the Scottish Parliament.

Employees whose marginal rate is the Scottish starter rate of 19% and who contribute to ‘net pay’ schemes receive tax relief at 19%; however, if they contribute to ‘relief at source’ schemes, they receive tax relief at the basic rate of 20% and HMRC don’t seek to recover the 1% difference.

Taxpayers liable to income tax at the Scottish intermediate, higher or top rates of 21%, 41% or 46% get tax relief on pensions contributions at 20% at source, and can claim the additional relief due through self assessment or by contacting HMRC.

Child benefit

While child benefit has existed since the 1970s and is fairly well understood, the high income child benefit charge (HICBC) has caused massive confusion ever since it was introduced in 2013.

Where an individual receives child benefit and either they or their partner have income of more than £50,000, HICBC claws back a tapered proportion of the child benefit received – up to 100% if that income is above £60,000.

Those affected have various options about what to do, and the consequences of these options are not obvious. The options are to:

  • not claim the benefit at all;
  • claim the benefit, but not to receive payment of it; or
  • receive the benefit but pay some or all of it back through HICBC.

Registering a claim for child benefit, but then opting not to receive it, is the only way to avoid an HICBC charge and its associated administration, while preserving national insurance entitlements.

Child benefit has important links with the wider national insurance system. It provides the main way children are issued a national insurance numbers as they turn 16. It also provides the child benefit claimant with NIC credits until the child is 12.

If child benefit is not claimed, the child will eventually face an additional step to prove their identity to get their national insurance number. Furthermore, one of the parents (very often the mother) may lose out on state pension, to which a more complete NIC record would entitle them.

The OTS wants the government to simplify the arrangements surrounding child benefit and HICBC, and improve related guidance.

Other recommendations

It suggests that HMRC should focus on practical issues arising in connection with starting work, changing jobs, taking on additional jobs and claiming expenses in its ongoing work to improve the operation of the PAYE system.

The report recommends maintaining Basic PAYE Tools software and improving related guidance for non-commercial employers, particularly those who employ carers

HMRC should review the forms issued once a death has been notified through ‘Tell Us Once’, and consider how they could work more effectively, rapidly and sensitively with personal representatives to gain a complete view of the tax affairs of the deceased and the survivor.

The OTS wants HMRC to integrate and improve its various sources of guidance for those helping others, including agents and those with powers of attorney, to help make it easier for suitable people (whether paid or not) to take on such roles.

HMRC should collaborate with schools, other educational bodies and academic researchers in their efforts to improve the public’s understanding of tax and finance.

Article supplied by Taxing Words Ltd

Tax: Simplifying the design of inheritance tax

By Donald Drysdale for ICAS

10 July 2019

Should we understand our taxes?

By Donald Drysdale for ICAS

14 February 2019

2022-11-mitigo 2022-11-mitigo
ICAS logo

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

ICAS logo

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: