ICAS ICAS logo

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Careers support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Finance + Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Business and governance
    5. Charities
    6. Coronavirus
    7. Corporate and financial reporting
    8. Cyber security
    9. Ethics
    10. Insolvency
    11. ICAS Research
    12. Pensions
    13. Practice
    14. Public sector
    15. Sustainability
    16. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD courses and qualifications
    2. CPD news and updates
    3. CPD support and advice
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

Out of time - a tougher line on appeals

  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
Philip McNeil By Philip McNeill, ICAS Head of Taxation, (Tax Practice and Owner Managed Business Taxes)

16 May 2018

Main Points

  • Courts are sticking to the rules.

  • Three months is late.

  • Check your procedures and be on time.

Philip McNeill looks at a recent case where permission for a late appeal was refused - and what you can do to get things right.

Tax is all about deadlines, and few deadlines can be more familiar than the 30 days appeal window against HMRC decisions. Appeals can be made late, but the conditions are getting tougher.

Change now felt

The Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) changed in April 2013, and this has caused some consternation in lower courts where, strictly speaking, the rules have no direct application.

Recent cases show that the tenet of the new rules, particularly rule 3.9 on stricter adherence to rules and procedures, are being felt across the tax system.

Impact on late appeals

In Patrick Mackin (Patrick Mackin TC06367 [2018] UKFTT 0110 (TC)) the Judge considered the application of the new rules to late appeals. Could CPR 3.9 be read as applying to appeals as well as to sanctions? Has the framework for late appeals changed and how can apparently conflicting Upper Tribunal judgements be reconciled?

The Patrick Mackin case concerned wrong-doing penalties and excise duty for allegedly running a fleet of haulage vehicles on duty-free red diesel instead of road-legal duty-paid fuel.

The principles as applied to late appeals sound a note of caution for all.

Time limits and procedures

The normal time limit for most tax appeals is 30 days from the date of the HMRC decision, but this is modified where there is a statutory review.

In direct tax cases, before making an appeal to the tribunal, the taxpayer may be offered a statutory review, or, in default, may ask for one.

In indirect tax cases, it is more usual for HMRC to undertake a review automatically.

Where there is a review, the time limits for appeal change. Normally an appeal to the Tribunal can be made 30 days from the date of the HMRC review decision; or where HMRC fails to make a decision, within 75 days of the date the review process should have commenced.

Hence where a review is in issue, the taxpayer’s appeal to the tribunal may still be within time, even though it is out with the initial 30-day window beginning with HMRC’s initial decision.

HMRC’s power to accept late appeals

The procedure for direct taxes and indirect taxes is slightly different.

For direct taxes, the initial appeal is normally addressed to HMRC, with an appeal to the tribunal if HMRC and the taxpayer disagree. For indirect taxes, the initial appeal is to the tribunal.

Additionally, HMRC may accept late appeals for direct taxes, under s49 TMA 1970 where it considers that there is a reasonable excuse for the delay and that the appeal has been lodged promptly once the reasonable excuse has ceased.

Tribunal powers to accept late appeals

Where HMRC does not accept a late appeal, the First Tier Tribunal may, on application, still accept a late appeal.

This is done under its powers of case management (rule 5 Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009 (SI 2009/273)).

The tribunal meets at this stage, not to consider the merits of the case, but only the question of whether a late appeal is to be permitted. This is where the influence of CPR 3.9 is being felt.

Three months is late

‘In the context of an appeal right which must be exercised within 30 days from the date of the document notifying the decision, a delay of more than three months cannot be described as anything but serious and significant.’ Romasave (Property Services) Ltd v Revenue and Customs Comrs [2015] UKUT 254 (TCC).

Three months is fast becoming the new norm. In Patrick Mackin’s case, there was a delay of over three years. The Tribunal expressly endorsed Romasave and concluded that three years was simply too long.

CPR 3.9 guidelines are for ‘litigation to be conducted efficiently and at proportionate cost’ and ‘to enforce compliance with rules, practice directions and orders’. Taking the sense of these words, a three-year delay is unacceptable for the exercising of a right which the taxpayer knew should be done within 30 days.

The conclusion was unavoidable. Permission for the late appeal was refused.

Last stand

But the taxpayer claimed that a valid appeal had been made contemporaneously. The appeal submitted three years late was only in support of an appeal already made. The agents had faxed a copy of the purported appeal to HMRC. Could this save the day?

Making a valid appeal

The taxpayer claimed that his accountants had submitted an appeal in October (or December) 2012, but HMRC said it had never been received.

If this letter had actually existed at the time and been delivered, would it not have been an in-time valid appeal?

Here again, the taxpayer failed: but need not have done.  To be valid, an appeal must contain a minimum of information. As a basic, an appeal should:

  • Be addressed to the right body
  • Include full identifying details of the taxpayer and the subject of the appeal
  • Give reasons why the appeal (or request for a late appeal) should be accepted
  • Be delivered within the time limit for appeal

But in Patrick Mackin, there was no evidence of posting for the purported contemporaneous appeal, so section 7 of the Interpretation Act 1978 could not be invoked to support deemed delivery. The letter appeared to have been incorrectly addressed and did not contain sufficient information about the subject of the dispute to constitute a valid appeal.

Furthermore, despite the lack of any acknowledgement of receipt of the appeal, no attempt had been made to chase it up.

Tougher

There has been a significant trend in recent years towards standardisation and greater adherence to procedures.

This can be summarised in two quotations. One from BPP holdings and one from McCarthy & Stone.

‘The cases on time limits and sanctions in the CPR do not apply directly, but the Tribunals should generally follow a similar approach’. BPP Holdings (BPP Holdings v Revenue and Customs Comrs [2017] UKSC 55).

‘Courts must be tougher and more robust than they have been hitherto when dealing with applications for relief from sanctions for failure to comply with any rule, direction or order’. Revenue and Customs Commissioners v McCarthy & Stone (Developments) Ltd [2014] UKUT 0196 (TCC).

Warning

The Patrick Mackin case sounds a warning note for taxpayers and agents alike. Tougher times are here.

Whatever the merits of your case or the bona fides of your explanation for failure to act, the first issue for the tribunal to consider is simply - have you complied with the rules?

London skyline

HMRC: Responsible for the 2016 leap year?

By Philip McNeill, Head of Taxation (Tax Practice and Owner Managed Business Taxes)

20 April 2018

HMRC

The taxing issues of 2018

By Hannah Downie, CA Today

26 February 2018

2022-11-mitigo 2022-11-mitigo
ICAS logo

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

ICAS logo

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: