ICAS ICAS logo

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Careers support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Finance + Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Business and governance
    5. Charities
    6. Coronavirus
    7. Corporate and financial reporting
    8. Cyber security
    9. Ethics
    10. Insolvency
    11. ICAS Research
    12. Pensions
    13. Practice
    14. Public sector
    15. Sustainability
    16. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD courses and qualifications
    2. CPD news and updates
    3. CPD support and advice
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

New thoughts on accounting for tax

  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
Donald-Drysdale By Donald Drysdale for ICAS

3 September 2019

Main points

  • The new Corporate Accountability Network (CAN) believes that accounts should serve all stakeholders of a company.
  • Controversially, CAN plans to publish a series of ‘corporate accountability standards’ (CAS) to replace IFRS.
  • CAS1, which focuses on accounting for tax, is intended as the first in this series.

Donald Drysdale comments on a controversial new proposal on accounting for tax, offered by CAN as the first in a series of ‘corporate accountability standards’ to replace IFRS.

Corporate accountability

The Corporate Accountability Network (CAN), established earlier this year to ensure that accountancy fulfils the public purpose for which it was originally intended, may be expected to cause controversy within the profession.

Accountancy and tax justice campaigner Richard Murphy, who chairs CAN, has spoken of “accountancy in crisis” and sees a fundamental problem with existing accounting standards. He wants accounts to play a more effective role in society at large.

It is no accident that these views are emerging at the same time as the accountancy profession has succumbed to a succession of accounting failures – in which not only auditing but also accounting standards have been called into question.

Instead of reporting only to the providers of capital, CAN takes the radical view that accounts should serve all stakeholders of a company – the suppliers of its capital, its trading partners, its employees, regulators, tax authorities and civil society.

It suggests that this wider approach to accounting would make accounting and business responsible to all in society, reflecting the substantial privilege enjoyed by limited liability companies. Furthermore, it would also be appropriate in the case of charities and national, regional and local government.

CAN seeks to promote accounting with a public purpose by proposing Corporate Accountability Standards (CAS) as a direct challenge to standards currently in use as set by the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation and other regulators.

Accounting for tax

In July CAN published a discussion document entitled ‘Corporate Accountability Standard 1: Taxation’ or CAS1, intended as the first in the series of alternative accounting standards.

CAS1 was produced to facilitate discussion on the need for a Corporate Accountability Standard on taxation. It emphasises that the issues it discusses do not necessarily reflect the Corporate Accountability Standard which might be issued in exposure draft format in due course.

Taking the interests of all stakeholder groups into account, CAN suggests a very different reporting standard. CAS1 contains the following new or innovative features:

  • significantly enhanced reporting on tax risk and related governance mechanisms;
  • full country-by-country reporting for all multinational reporting entities;
  • enhanced reporting for corporate income taxes – particularly the separation of current and deferred tax reporting, enhanced tax reconciliations disclosing effective tax rates paid, accounting proof showing that corporation tax liabilities declared are actually paid, and disclosure of when deferred tax liabilities or assets might result in cash paid or received;
  • disclosure (as suggested for corporate income tax) for sales and value-added taxes, employment taxes, and taxes deducted from employees; and
  • additional data to explain tax paid in the extractive industries, on a project basis.

The standard would be extended to governments (whether national, state, regional or local), requiring every level of government to account for the taxes it expects to be paid and those it actually receives, and incorporating a standard for tax gap reporting.

CAS1 would apply to all but the very smallest reporting entities. It is suggested that it would apply to all reporting entities, except those with unlimited liability and less than 50 employees and those with limited liability and less than 25 employees.

Materiality would be considered relative to the interests of the various stakeholders – not those of the reporting entity alone. The rationale for this is that the impact on stakeholders (especially employees) can be equivalent whatever the size of the reporting entity.

CAS1 would help civil society to hold both companies and governments to account. All reporting entities, including governments, would be substantially more accountable to their stakeholders for the tax liabilities that they owe, handle or manage in a wide range of capacities.

CAN regards this enhanced focus as essential, given the significance of tax in almost every economy and the fact that very large numbers of companies fail because of their inability to manage and settle their tax liabilities.

It claims that CAS1 would deliver more information to the directors of most companies, on the tax management of the entities for which they are responsible, than many of them would ever have received to date.

The standard would facilitate better-informed political debate on tax issues. It would reassure investors, or worry them, resulting in a better allocation of capital in financial markets. It would help trading partners and employees to make better decisions on their own risks.

Debate

According to CAN, there is “…a fundamental problem with existing accounting standards.  The plethora of accounting failures in recent years has not just happened because of poor auditing, although that has contributed. The rules of accounting have also failed society, quite badly. This is because IFRS accounting standards are not fit for purpose.”

It is not for me to predict how ICAS and the other established accountancy bodies may react to the publication of CAN’s proposed Corporate Accountability Standards.

Murphy is a chartered accountant and political economist with a high profile as a seasoned campaigner. He has a track record of raising controversial accounting, tax and economic issues, and a reputation for persistence.

If his radical views on accounting standards succeed in generating useful debate, readers might find it helpful to have studied the approach taken in CAS1.

Article supplied by Taxing Words Ltd

2022-11-mitigo 2022-11-mitigo
ICAS logo

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

ICAS logo

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: