ICAS ICAS logo

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Careers support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Finance + Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Business and governance
    5. Charities
    6. Coronavirus
    7. Corporate and financial reporting
    8. Cyber security
    9. Ethics
    10. Insolvency
    11. ICAS Research
    12. Pensions
    13. Practice
    14. Public sector
    15. Sustainability
    16. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD courses and qualifications
    2. CPD news and updates
    3. CPD support and advice
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

Matchmaking services and VAT

  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
By Jan Garioch CA

13 December 2019

Key points

  • HMRC contend that matchmaking is not consultancy, but is the selling of the possibility of entering a long-term happy relationship.
  • The appellant got recognition for expertise in reading body language and exercising intuition but faced challenge on the role of assistants with little background on matchmaking.
  • The Tribunal struggled to find a unanimous conclusion.

Does a matchmaking service fall under the consultants’ services provisions (VATA 1994 Sch4A para16(2)(d)) so that supplies to non-taxable persons outside the EU fall outside the scope?

Jan Garioch CA discusses a recent case, Gray & Farrar International LLP v HMRC, which saw the First Tier Tribunal divided on its impact.

The point at issue

If you enjoy guessing the outcome of tax cases as soon as you have read the first paragraph, then Gray & Farrar International LLP(G&F) v HMRC will be up your street. The issue is simple. The appellant ran an exclusive matchmaking business and claimed its service fell within “the services of consultants, engineers, consultancy firms, lawyers, accountants and other similar services as well as data processing and the provision of information”.

If it could convince the Tribunal, then its services to non-taxable persons who reside outside the EU would be treated as made outside the EU and thus outside the scope of VAT. Unsurprisingly, hitherto HMRC had been unconvinced and had raised assessments on the appellant.

The common ground

When the Tribunal took stock of the battlefield between HMRC and appellant, they found a reasonable amount of common ground. There was no dispute between the parties that G&F provided a single composite supply. There was also broad agreement based on past case law that (a) consultants supply advice based on a high degree of expertise and (b) that included specialist and expert advice by someone with extensive experience/qualifications on the subject. The Tribunal felt (b) hit the nail on the head because advice given by a person with relevant experience which falls within the domain of that experience is specialist or expert advice. There was no need to ask whether the advice itself was in some way specialist or expert.

There was agreement on how the business operated. G&F interviewed all prospective clients for approximately 2 hours before preparing a brief describing the client and the characteristics of the person he/she was seeking. Once the brief was approved, G&F offered introductions from its network of contacts. G&F then followed up with weekly calls, and advice and coaching might be offered within those calls. The managing partner stated that she alone was responsible for matching one client to another. She claimed she did not deputise others or use computer algorithms for that task. However, she did not carry out all of the interviews herself or make all of the weekly follow up calls.

Witness credibility

The managing partner was a key witness, but she had mixed success in swaying the Tribunal. Her evidence that she had matchmaking expertise was accepted. The Tribunal acknowledged her years of experience and accepted that she could identify personality traits relevant to the selection of a suitable partner based on her intuition and her reading of body language and general approach.

However, her role in post introduction liaison and provision of advice and coaching was held to be less than she portrayed. She was found to be hesitant in offering figures on how her time was spent and at times figures changed from what she had volunteered before. HMRC landed a convincing blow when they used her estimates to produce an annual total for her personal input since this was substantially higher than would be possible with the 60-hour week she claimed to work. The consequence of this was that the Tribunal was united in concluding that the role of her assistants, who changed over time and were not held to share her expertise, had been underplayed.

Factor to consider

The Tribunal were struck that continuing post introduction contact with clients differentiated G&F from an online dating service where no support was given. It was an important feature of G&F’s supply from the perspective of clients and not merely incidental.

Reaching a decision

However, the two members of the Tribunal disagreed on the impact of this factor. The Tribunal Chairman considered the assistants, by regular contact with the client, provided in a “readymade confidante for the client” with whom he/she could discuss hopes and concerns for relationships.  Although he accepted that the managing partner could step in to provide expertise, he concluded the client obtained support and informal advice from the assistants. This was not sufficiently inconsequential to say that it was just part of the managing partner’s advice that a person might be suitable.

Contrastingly, the other Tribunal member considered the telephone calls with the liaison team prompted the use of the information and advice provided by the managing partner. The feedback the liaison team gave enabled the advice and information provided by the managing partner to be better used. The feedback they collected was no more than collection of information. The onward transition of that was no more than provision of information. The liaison team merely helped the expert advice to be used. Their support was all provided under the oversight of the managing partner and their input should be regarded as ancillary to the expert advice she provided.

Where a Tribunal consisting of two members is not unanimous, the casting vote goes to the Chair. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed (but everyone who plays the game of guessing outcome after reading paragraph one has the comfort of finding some support for their view.)

Ensuring HMRC’s automated processes are valid

By Susan Cattell, Head of Tax Technical Policy

29 November 2019

Is the zero rating for the issue of a bank note restricted to newly printed banknotes?

By Jan Garioch CA

12 July 2019

2022-11-mitigo 2022-11-mitigo
ICAS logo

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

ICAS logo

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: