ICAS ICAS logo

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Careers support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Finance + Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Charities
    5. Coronavirus
    6. Corporate and financial reporting
    7. Business and governance
    8. Ethics
    9. Insolvency
    10. ICAS Research
    11. Pensions
    12. Practice
    13. Public sector
    14. Sustainability
    15. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD courses and qualifications
    2. CPD news and updates
    3. CPD support and advice
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

Jan Garioch CA discusses the Upper Tribunal case Hampton George Hewitt v HMRC

  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
By Jan Garioch CA

4 October 2021

Key points:

  • HMRC withdrew the appellant’s certificate to use the agricultural flat rate scheme for VAT purposes.
  • The withdrawal was initially accepted by the appellant until a successful challenge in the courts from another farming business which also had its flat rate certificate removed.
  • The appellant belatedly sought to appeal against HMRC’s action.

Jan Garioch CA discusses the case of Hampton George Hewitt v HMRC where the appellant seeks to make a late appeal against HMRC’s decision to remove his entitlement to use the agricultural flat rate scheme.

The background

Hampton George Hewitt v HMRC relates to a decision by HMRC to cancel the appellant’s certificate as a flat rate farmer for VAT purposes. The impact of the agricultural flat rate allows farmers to charge and retain a flat rate percentage (currently 4%) on qualifying goods and services sold to VAT registered customers. In the case of Mr Hewitt, HMRC decided to cancel his certificate as a flat rate farmer. His certificate was originally granted back in 2004, but by 2012 HMRC considered that the flat rate scheme provided Mr Hewitt with substantially more compensation than the amount of input VAT he would have been able to recover if he had been VAT registered. HMRC has regulatory powers to cancel a certificate where they consider it necessary for the protection of the revenue, and that is what they did with effect from 31 October 2012. HMRC’s decision informed Mr Hewitt that he was entitled to appeal and set out the applicable time limits.

Hopes raised by an ECJ decision

Mr Hewitt initially accepted that decision, but changed his mind following the case of Shields & Sons Partnership v HMRC. Shields also had its flat rate certificate withdrawn, but it appealed and ultimately its case was referred to the ECJ to answer the question of whether “farmers who are found to be recovering substantially more as members of the common flat-rate scheme for farmers than they would if they were subject to the normal VAT arrangements could constitute a category of farmers which could legitimately be excluded”. The ECJ held that Article 296(2) of the Principal VAT Directive must be interpreted as laying down exhaustively the reasons for exclusion from the flat rate scheme and it does not include recovering substantially more than if the farmer were part of normal VAT arrangements.

The route to the Upper Tribunal

Following the ECJ’s judgement on Shields in December 2017, Mr Hewitt wrote to HMRC claiming they were wrong to have removed him from the flat rate scheme and requested a refund of over £65,000. HMRC refused to reinstate him and offered either a review of the decision to refuse the application to join the AFRS from “a current date” or, alternatively, the opportunity to appeal to the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) against that decision. As Mr Hewitt was outside the time limit to appeal the original decision to remove his flat rate certificate, he sought permission from the FTT to bring a late appeal. The FTT refused permission but Mr Hewitt was granted leave to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (UT). The UT consented to hear the case and decide whether the FTT had erred in law by refusing the appeal and therefore failing to give full effect to the EU law principle of effectiveness and thus denying Mr Hewitt an effective remedy to enforce his EU law rights. (It was common ground that the principle of effectiveness was a retained general principle of EU law.)

The outline arguments

Mr Hewitt’s case was that the appeal time limit expired at a point when he could not be aware that he had an enforceable right. Indeed, it was not until the decision in the Shields case was produced that he could be aware of his enforceable right. The position for HMRC was that Mr Hewitt had an effective right of appeal before the Shields judgement. There is no requirement that time cannot run for the purposes of a time limit prior to a taxpayer being aware of their rights.

The Upper Tribunal’s view

The UT proceeded on the basis that at the time it was done, the cancellation of Mr Hewitt’s flat rate certificate was a breach of a directly effective right under EU law to participate in the flat rate scheme. Therefore, the UT defined the question arising in the appeal to be whether an effective remedy exists for the breach of the taxpayer’s EU rights. Both the ECJ and UK courts have found it is not incompatible with the principle of effectiveness to impose a reasonable time limit on claims provided that does not make it excessively difficult or impossible to enforce EU rights. Reflecting on that, the UT found it was reasonable to allow the period of 30 days to appeal against the withdrawal of the flat rate scheme certificate. In the UT’s view, the cancellation of the certificate had an immediate effect, so this was not a circumstance where the taxpayer did not know that circumstances had arisen which he might want to challenge. The UT felt it was important that issues regarding cancellation of certificates were identified and resolved promptly. Mr Hewitt could have exerted his right to appeal, but he chose not to.  By contrast, Shields exerted that right and in due course was successful. Therefore, the UT decided the appeal in favour of HMRC.

HMRC’s latest guidance notice on VAT deferred due to coronavirus

By Jan Garioch

6 August 2021

Should the VAT land exemption be simplified?

By Susan Cattell, Head of Tax Technical Policy

2 September 2021

2022-01-xero 2022-01-xero
ICAS logo

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

ICAS logo

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: