ICAS ICAS logo

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Careers support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Finance + Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Business and governance
    5. Charities
    6. Coronavirus
    7. Corporate and financial reporting
    8. Cyber security
    9. Ethics
    10. Insolvency
    11. ICAS Research
    12. Pensions
    13. Practice
    14. Public sector
    15. Sustainability
    16. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD courses and qualifications
    2. CPD news and updates
    3. CPD support and advice
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

How should HMRC impart CGT changes?

  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
Donald-Drysdale By Donald Drysdale for ICAS

5 July 2019

Main points:

  • Capital gains tax (CGT) reporting procedures are changing from 6 April 2020.

  • HMRC have published research on how they should communicate these changes.

  • Based on a tiny sample of users, are the conclusions of the research valid?

HMRC have published research on how they should communicate about forthcoming CGT policy changes, and Donald Drysdale examines the approach which has been taken.

CGT policy changes

Doubtless you’re aware that, from 6 April 2020, capital gains tax (CGT) reporting procedures are changing.

On disposal of any non-exempt residential property from that date onwards, a payment on account of CGT will need to be made within 30 days of completion. The person disposing of the property will also have to submit a 'payment on account return’ within the same time limit.

These new requirements will affect those disposing of second homes or rental properties. They will not apply to disposals covered wholly by private residence relief (PPR), but will apply to the non-exempt element of the gain where only partial PPR is available.

For ordinary UK taxpayers, many of whom do not engage tax advisers, these changes will impose new tax compliance pressures, a stringent new reporting requirement, a cash flow cost, and new risks of interest and penalties even for the most innocent of mistakes.

The new regime mirrors the non-resident CGT (NRCGT) filing and payment requirements introduced from April 2015, while also replacing and extending the reporting and payment rules for non-residents.

The research

HMRC have recently published CGT communications research exploring how taxpayers and their advisers look for, and would prefer to receive, information about the forthcoming policy changes for property disposals.

This was qualitative rather than quantitative research. It sought to understand how taxpayers and intermediaries seek information about CGT; their understanding of the policy changes; and expectations of the best way for HMRC to communicate these changes.

Methodology

The report was attributed to the “Behaviour, Insight and Research Team”, based on research undertaken by the Employment, Welfare and Skills team within Ipsos MORI’s Social Research Institute. It relied on detailed discussion with relatively small sample sizes and did not claim to be statistically representative.

The astonishingly small samples of research subjects comprised 6 UK-resident individuals who had paid CGT recently on property disposals, 9 individuals (6 resident and 3 non-resident) who were considering property disposals in the next 12 months, and 5 intermediaries who deal with CGT.

The intermediaries interviewed were 3 accountants, one solicitor and one estate agent. While I accept that the conclusions were not presented as statistically relevant, I can’t resist comparing this sample size of 5 with the total of around 97,500 UK businesses with Standard Industrial Classification 2007 (SIC 2007) codes indicative of such activities in 2018.

Conclusions of the report

The research concluded that ‘one-off disposal’ taxpayers – for example, those selling a recently-inherited property, a second home or a dwelling they had rented out – were least likely to know about CGT. It found that those in this group who used agents did so on an informal basis, simply where they had a question on CGT.

‘Multiple disposal’ taxpayers, such as landlords owning and renting several properties, were likely to know more about CGT and were more self-sufficient, but they sometimes consulted accountants for a sense-check of their CGT calculations before filing their self-assessment returns.

Accountants and solicitors reported that they inform their clients about CGT payment deadlines. Nonetheless, some ‘one-off disposal’ customers do miss such deadlines.

Among taxpayers looking for information about CGT, the gov.uk website appears high on their search results. To my surprise, the site is perceived as “authoritative, credible and up to date” – although navigation could be difficult therefore relevant information such as payment deadlines might easily be missed.

Intermediaries learn about CGT policy changes through various channels, including CPD and the professional press. Typically they don’t tend to consult gov.uk but (unlike the research report) I would attribute this at least partly to a lack of confidence in the website.

All the research subjects were asked to review two HMRC documents, each communicating the CGT policy changes – one for UK residents and the other for non-residents. Individuals and intermediaries all described the information as over-complicated by the style of language and quantity of text.

Broadly, they all had difficulty with an overall understanding of what HMRC were trying to communicate. Information regarding the payment on account was not always clear, even to those with more experience.

Landlords and other more experienced property disposal taxpayers were happy to receive direct communications from HMRC regarding the policy changes, while individuals without agents thought gov.uk the most appropriate channel if information there was easily accessible.

All those interviewed believed that the policy changes should be communicated as soon as possible, given that the property disposal process can sometimes be lengthy and could involve complex discussions around tax with intermediaries.

My reactions

As I began reading the executive summary to the report, I was doubtful whether any worthwhile conclusions could be drawn from research based on such a small sample size.

When so few taxpayers and intermediaries are included, some of the nuances are missed. For example, the report suggests (misleadingly) that no agents are regularly providing their clients with ongoing compliance support and advice regarding property disposals.

On further reflection, it was instructive to learn that the two documents drafted by HMRC had been found wanting. If these can be improved so that they communicate clear information about the CGT policy changes to their intended audiences, then significant benefits should flow from the exercise.

Nonetheless, it is questionable whether such a tiny sample of taxpayers and intermediaries provides the best sounding board. Couldn’t HMRC have reached a better feel for the effectiveness of their proposed communications by consulting with the main tax, accountancy and law professional bodies?

Finally, I remain sceptical about the apparently high approval rating given to the gov.uk website. Among the many tax specialists known to me, a substantial proportion regard its content as dangerously over-simplified and its navigation processes as tortuous.

Article supplied by Taxing Words Ltd

2022-11-mitigo 2022-11-mitigo
ICAS logo

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

ICAS logo

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: