ICAS

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  • Advantage
  1. About us
    1. Governance
    2. ICAS strategy 2030
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Career support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. Find a training agreement
    4. Why become a CA
    5. The CA qualification
    6. Accredited qualifications and exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Train a Chartered Accountant
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Government-funded apprenticeships
    5. Learning redefined
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
    2. Digital Practice Conference 2023
  8. CA magazine
  9. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Business and governance
    5. Charities
    6. Coronavirus
    7. Corporate and financial reporting
    8. Cyber security
    9. Ethics
    10. Insolvency
    11. ICAS Research
    12. Pensions
    13. Practice
    14. Public sector
    15. Sustainability
    16. Tax
    17. Vulnerable persons toolkit
    18. EDI Toolkit
    19. Wellbeing Toolkit
    20. Trust in Chartered Accountants
    21. Research highlights trust
  10. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD - Everything you need to know
    2. CPD courses and qualifications
    3. CPD news and updates
    4. CPD support and advice
    5. Career support
  11. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
    5. ICAS regulatory functions report 2022
    6. Regulation Strategy
    7. ICAS Regulation News
  12. CA jobs
    1. Rutherford Cross | Specialists in Finance Recruitment
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
    6. Hutcheon Mearns | Transforming finance
  13. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  14. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

HMRC loss at Tax Tribunal over P11D dispensation row

  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
Justine Riccomini By Justine Riccomini, Head of Tax (Employment and Devolved Taxes)

18 May 2023

Main points

  • The NMW Solutions case provides interesting insight into HMRC’s approach to employment taxes and P11D dispensations.
  • Almost £2m was at stake.
  • The Tribunal found in favour of the employer.

Justine Riccomini explains how NMW Solutions Ltd won its case at the First Tier Tribunal.

Who would have thought that something as ostensibly simple as a P11D dispensation would be the subject of a tax tribunal case?

In the NWM Solutions Ltd v HMRC [2023] UKFTT 364 (TC) case which was decided in April 2023, the P11D dispensation took centre stage, which serves to remind us that any aspect of taxation can potentially come back to bite us. However – in this case, it wasn’t the employer (an umbrella company) who received the bite – it was HMRC.

Obsolete legislation

There is no longer a requirement for an employer to obtain written permission to exclude certain benefits in kind from a P11D (a P11D dispensation), due to the introduction of so-called “benchmark rates” for travel and subsistence payments, which for the 2015-16 tax year are set out at EIM05231.

The rules contained within s.65 ITEPA 2003 and s.70 (2)(c) ITEPA 2003 which were removed from the statute books on 23 March 2015 under FA2015, required the employee or director to have “paid away” the expenses. In other words, they had to have incurred an expense for it to have been reimbursed to them free of income tax and NICs under the terms of the P11D dispensation. The employer was supposed to check that the expenses had in fact been incurred. The requirement to actually incur additional expense (as opposed to taking a home-made packed lunch) was also contained in EIM05231 for the 2015-16 to 2018-19 years; but from 6 April 2019, the legislation at s. 289 ITEPA was amended by virtue of s.289A(4A) ITEPA 2003 in FA 2019 to lower the checking requirement to that of ensuring that qualifying travel had been undertaken. This new guidance is set out at EIM30225.

In this case, the employer was paying scale rate expenses for subsistence. When HMRC demanded to see receipts for all the meal allowances that had been paid, the employer found they could not provide them in many cases. HMRC did not revoke the dispensation as they would have been entitled to do under s. 65(6) ITEPA 2003. Nevertheless, they argued that NWM owed almost £2m in Income tax and NICs.

Cases considered

The following cases were referred to by the judiciary in helping them reach their decision:

  • Pook (Inspector of Taxes) v Owen (1969) 45 TC 571 (HL);
  • Donnelly (Inspector of Taxes) v Williamson [1982] STC 88 (HC) (Williamson);
  • Cheshire Employer and Skills Development Ltd v RCC [2012] EWCA Civ 1429 (CA) (Cheshire); and
  • Reed Employment plc v RCC [2014] UKUT 160 (TC) (UT) (Reed).

Turning point

At Paragraphs 66-68 of the judgement, Judge Austen states:

“The parties are in agreement that the Dispensation in this case was in force at all material times. As a result, we consider that the only factual question which arises for determination at this point is whether NWMSL had an obligation to account for tax for reasons unrelated to s.65, per Reed FTT at [292].  If the answer to that is “yes”, then then NWMSL would have to account for that tax (because s.65 and the Dispensation would be irrelevant, whether or not in force). But if not, then Reed at [334]-[337] is clear in our view that the Dispensation was “fully effective…unless and until revoked”. Most importantly, our own construction of s.65 leads us to the same conclusion.

67. We have concluded that the “listed provisions” in s.65(1) did apply to the payments subject to this appeal because (unlike those in Reed), we found above that, being the reimbursement of expenses incurred by employees, the payments were within the scope of Chapter 3, which is one of the “listed provisions” in s.65(1).

68. As a result, we have decided that the reasoning in Reed at [334]-[337] applies, as contended by Mr Ewart.  The effect of the Dispensation is therefore that…all the payments subject to this appeal were automatically removed from any liability to tax.”

This was a turning point for NWM because the FTT considered that as HMRC had not revoked the dispensation, the tax and NICS were not payable as the spirit of the dispensation was to provide an administrative easement.

Conclusion

In allowing the appeal in full and setting the HMRC determinations aside, the FTT concluded:

“… the effect of a dispensation is to remove relevant payments entirely from the scope of taxation. We therefore conclude that unless and until a dispensation is revoked, it is not open to HMRC to assess to tax any payment purportedly made under it. In this case, the parties were agreed that the Dispensation was never revoked by HMRC. Accordingly, even if HMRC were right to say that NWM was in material breach of the conditions in the Dispensation, they could not issue the Determinations and Decisions, and it would have been irrelevant even if NWMSL was found to be in material breach of the conditions purportedly contained in the Dispensation.”

It is worth reviewing cases such as this when the taxman comes to call. In this case, the employer saved the best part of £2m.

If you wish to contribute to the debate…why not join an ICAS tax committee and bring your expertise straight to the Tax team?

More IR35 chaos with opposing high-profile tax tribunal decisions

By Justine Riccomini, Head of Tax (Employment and Devolved Taxes)

17 April 2023

Pensions tax changes: What you need to know

By Susan Cattell, Head of Tax Technical Policy

16 March 2023

2023-11-dell

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • TikTok (opens new window) TikTok Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon
  • Youtube (opens new window)

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy
  • Women in Finance Charter (opens new window) Women in Finance Charter

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: