ICAS ICAS logo

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Careers support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Finance + Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Business and governance
    5. Charities
    6. Coronavirus
    7. Corporate and financial reporting
    8. Cyber security
    9. Ethics
    10. Insolvency
    11. ICAS Research
    12. Pensions
    13. Practice
    14. Public sector
    15. Sustainability
    16. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD courses and qualifications
    2. CPD news and updates
    3. CPD support and advice
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

Dispute over input VAT connected with fraudulent evasion of VAT

  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
By Jan Garioch, CA

18 December 2018

Main Points:

  • HMRC’s suspicions about a buffer in an MTIC fraud chain undermines their argument on fraudulent loss.

  • HMRC fails to convince the Tribunal that they were correct to refuse input VAT repayment in all cases.

  • However, the appellant fails to convince the Tribunal that he could not have known of fraud in any of the challenged transactions.

Jan Garioch CA discusses the case Alan McCord v HMRC TC 06812 and the Tribunal’s analysis of whether certain transactions were connected with fraudulent evasion of VAT.


Alan McCord was registered for VAT as a sole trader dealing in mainly second-hand cars. He operated in Northern Ireland and fell into dispute with HMRC when input tax repayments exceeding £62,000 were withheld on the grounds that they had been traced back to identified tax loss where there was fraudulent evasion; namely, missing trader fraud.

The disputed input tax related to purchases of cars from two sellers who were registered for short periods and failed to declare substantial sums of VAT without any explanation. HMRC contended that the appellant knew, or should have known, that the transactions in relation to which the input tax arose were connected with fraudulent evasion of VAT.

The Tribunal reminded themselves of the following key case law.

  • In Optigen Ltd and others v Commissioners of Customs and Excise (Cases C354/03, C-355/03 and C-384/03) it was held that the right to deduct input VAT cannot be affected by the fact that in the chain of supply of which those transactions form part another prior or subsequent transaction is invalidated by value-added tax fraud, without that taxable person knowing or having any means of knowing.
  • Joined cases C-439/04 Axel Kittel v État Belge and C-440/04 État Belge v Recolta Recycling SPRL established that the only person in a chain of transactions who can be regarded as not carrying on an economic activity is the person who fraudulently evades VAT.  A person in the chain who is not the fraudulent evader cannot be said not to be carrying on an economic activity and it would contravene fiscal neutrality to automatically deny the right to deduct input VAT. However, that right can be denied where the taxable person while not being a fraudulent evader themselves nonetheless knew of the fraudulent evasion or should have known of it from objective factors.
  • The leading domestic case, Mobilx Ltd (in administration) v HMRC; Blue Sphere Global Ltd v HMRC; Calltel Telecom Ltd and another v HMRC (No 2) [2010] EWCA Civ 517 asked what is meant by ‘should have known’. It questioned whether that test was met if it was more likely than not that the purchase was connected to fraud but held that was not sufficient. However, there is no swing to the opposite end of the scale. HMRC are not required to establish that fraud is the only reasonable explanation of whether a deal was too good to be true. The lower test of balance of probabilities applies.

The Tribunal listened to argument from HMRC that the appellant’s deals lacked commerciality; due diligence was inadequate, it was unrealistic that he was able to make quick profit when sellers and purchasers previously unknown to him turned up, vehicles were collected before cheques cleared in an obviously uncommercial way, lack of contracts and issue of blank cheques were part of a picture from which every facet of legitimate arm’s length trading was absent. The appellant’s submission was in essence that he had done his best, had kept a paper trail for all the transactions and had no official guidance on MTIC fraud from HMRC at the time of the deals. He did not know, nor could he have known of the fraud in the transactions.

The Tribunal concluded that input VAT should be denied on purchases from one seller, but not the other. In the first case the Tribunal was convinced that the deals looked too good to be true. They viewed the arrival unannounced of UK sellers and purchasers from the Republic at such convenient times was too good to be true and was not a coincidence. They thought the purchasers and sellers were in league and that the deals were contrived.

In the second case, they considered that HMRC had undermined their own case that there was a fraudulent loss by acknowledging that this second seller may have been a buffer and a blocker.

A “buffer” is a trader which is inserted between a defaulting trader and a subsequent exporter who reclaims VAT, and who, at least in the classic mobile phone and computer CPU MTICs, buys and sells for a small profit leading to an equally small VAT bill. A “blocker” frustrates HMRC investigations by avoiding meaningful contact from them. As no return was submitted by the second seller, HMRC did not know what input VAT would have been deductible from the output VAT which they knew was due from invoices issued.

Therefore, they could not show that the appellant’s deals were ones where any VAT charged to the appellant was inevitably going to be both due and unpaid. If there is no loss, there cannot have been a fraudulent loss and the appellant cannot be connected with such a loss.

VAT reverse charge for construction services

The Budget change to VAT on vouchers

By Jan Garioch, CA

9 November 2018

2-23-marsh 2-23-marsh
ICAS logo

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

ICAS logo

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: