ICAS

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
    2. ICAS Strategy 2030
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Career support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
    5. Learning redefined
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Business and governance
    5. Charities
    6. Coronavirus
    7. Corporate and financial reporting
    8. Cyber security
    9. Ethics
    10. Insolvency
    11. ICAS Research
    12. Pensions
    13. Practice
    14. Public sector
    15. Sustainability
    16. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD - Everything you need to know
    2. CPD courses and qualifications
    3. CPD news and updates
    4. CPD support and advice
    5. Career support
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

Digital tax: Will HMRC ever learn?

Frustrated-Man
  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
Donald-Drysdale By Donald Drysdale for ICAS

18 January 2018

Main Points

  • HMRC’s digital systems are frustratingly unreliable.
  • A report on a post-implementation review of RTI was held back, apparently to allow deficiencies to be addressed first.
  • Will lessons learnt from RTI be used to help make MTD a success?

A post-implementation review of RTI reveals shortcomings, and Donald Drysdale wonders whether lessons learnt will be taken into account in MTD.

Why digital?

Digital tax administration should reduce costs and enhance the tax compliance experience, not only for HMRC but also for individual taxpayers, businesses and their tax agents.  Good IT-based tax systems ought to be available 24/7, improving access to key HMRC services and making tax compliance easier all round.

Even HMRC agree. On 27 December they tweeted: “You can do your #SelfAssessment return online at a time to suit you.  Over 6,000 were done on Christmas Eve, 2,500 on Christmas Day and over 7,500 on Boxing Day this year.”

Imagine a world in which HMRC systems were as accessible as this – not only for taxpayers with time to spare over the festive season, but for individuals, businesses and agents seeking to interact with the tax authority at any time of day on any day of the year.

Recent digital glitches at HMRC

A couple of weeks ago, not wanting to let my tax return peck away at me, I got everything ready and headed to HMRC’s online portal.

The system accepted my income detail but then stated that the facility to submit the return was unavailable.  It suggested I try again in a day or two.  I did so, repeatedly, and several days later I successfully submitted my return on the fourth attempt.

If this was an isolated glitch, I might have forgiven HMRC for wasting my time and causing me significant inconvenience.  However, the reality was more sinister.  On 6 January, for example, it wasn’t only personal tax returns that couldn’t be submitted; most HMRC systems were unavailable, including RTI and VAT.

We are told how Making Tax Digital (MTD) will transform compliance, make our lives easier, cut compliance costs, and reduce tax lost through taxpayer error and fraud.  These are worthy aims, but MTD – even just for VAT – is causing grave concerns among businesses. Before it proceeds, perhaps we should ask whether HMRC’s existing digital systems are fit for purpose.

Real Time Information – the pilot

The RTI programme implemented the biggest change to PAYE since 1944.  It relied on digital systems to accelerate filing of employers’ payroll information, streamline collection of tax and NICs from employees, improve the accuracy of tax credits payments and support the introduction of Universal Credit.

RTI began with a pilot involving some 300 employers and pension providers, recommended by their payroll software providers as a representative sample across business sectors and sizes.  For these digitally-aware pilot users, the move to RTI was generally less traumatic than for most small employers, who were not forced to comply until RTI had been tried and tested.  This approach allowed extra time for the less digitally-aware to adjust to the new regime.

In a review of the pilot, HMRC wrote: “The pilot enabled HMRC to learn lessons in a controlled way with a relatively small segment of the employer population, and put in place measures to address emerging issues, prior to full roll-out.”  That sounded appropriate.

Real Time Information – the post-implementation review

In April 2016 HMRC launched a post-implementation review to address whether RTI had achieved what it had set out to do; how RTI was performing more than three years after it started in April 2013; and what needed to be done to improve performance and make best use of RTI as a strategic asset for government.

HMRC’s report on this review, completed in April 2017, was held back for eight months before publication in December 2017 – apparently to allow time for deficiencies to be addressed first.  However, some won’t be resolved until March 2019, a full seven years after the RTI pilot was launched.

Following the pilot, implementation of RTI had taken place in phases – with the largest employers first.  The post-implementation review claimed RTI as a success, but the report set out useful pointers for HMRC’s newer IT projects.

It detailed a trail of material shortcomings with RTI data.  These included unexplained discrepancies, duplicated employment records, unallocated credits, growing numbers of temporary reference numbers, and unidentified issues with the performance of the national insurance number verification request service.

Five years after the pilot had started, RTI systems were still being blamed for a host of problems.  Employers and agents were unable to view their accounts in real time and had difficulty understanding how their liabilities were made up.  Processes for updating current and earlier years or providing further information ought to have been more user-friendly. Reporting pay ‘on or before’ the date of payment remained an insuperable burden for many small employers, and there are still demands to move to monthly reporting.

HMRC’s RTI communications and guidance had not reached all employers, with some small employers struggling to understand their reporting obligations and the consequences of not meeting them.  External stakeholders had called on HMRC to consider different ways of reaching and engaging with small employers.

HMRC estimated that RTI had imposed one-off and transitional costs of £292 million on employers, while (by strange coincidence) saving employers £292 million a year. They accepted that some external stakeholders believe these figures to be wrong.  Furthermore, I’d suggest that the extra costs may have fallen predominantly on small employers dragged kicking and screaming into RTI, while any savings may be accruing primarily to large employers who had already been operating digitally.

Trust registration service

Although RTI was criticised for allowing inadequate access for tax agents, HMRC have been slow to learn from this, as explained here.

In spite of 80% of trusts being dealt with by agents, HMRC’s online trust registration service (TRS) was launched much more recently – in July 2017 – with no facility for agent access until this was provided from 17 October.  Given that trusts created in 2016/17 were required to register by 5 October, this attracted an outcry until the deadline was extended – first to 5 December and later to 5 January.

Pre-existing trusts must also register to submit a tax return.  The deadline for them to register for 2016/17 is 31 January 2018.  HMRC came under pressure to extend this and have agreed not to levy penalties where registration takes place by 5 March.

Making Tax Digital

MTD envisages a transformation of tax compliance even more far-reaching than RTI, but there are already fears of history repeating itself.  For example, many small businesses may struggle to understand their reporting obligations and the consequences of not meeting them.

HMRC have failed to provide convincing estimates of the one-off and transitional costs of MTD for businesses, or of savings that might subsequently flow from it.  Concerns have already been raised about whether the role of tax agents is being properly taken into account in relation to MTD.

RTI started with those most likely to be able to cope with the technology, to prove that the new procedures worked.  Why, therefore, will MTD apply from the outset to the smallest businesses within its scope, many of whom are not accustomed to using digital accounting systems?

Rather than hold back evidence of shortcomings in an attempt to improve their image, wouldn’t it be better if HMRC recognised the value of the lessons in the RTI report and concentrated on learning from them?

Article supplied by Taxing Words Ltd

Networked-City-Concept

Will MTD improve tax compliance?

2023-05-markel 2023-05-markel

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: