ICAS ICAS logo

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Careers support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Finance + Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Business and governance
    5. Charities
    6. Coronavirus
    7. Corporate and financial reporting
    8. Cyber security
    9. Ethics
    10. Insolvency
    11. ICAS Research
    12. Pensions
    13. Practice
    14. Public sector
    15. Sustainability
    16. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD courses and qualifications
    2. CPD news and updates
    3. CPD support and advice
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

Deciding whether a payment is a termination payment or a restrictive covenant

  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
Justine Riccomini By Justine Riccomini, Head of Tax (Employment and Devolved taxes)

27 January 2023

Main points

  • Mrs A’s employer deducted tax from a payment made to her under a settlement agreement.
  • Mrs A submitted an overpayment claim on her tax return.
  • The FTT ruled that the payment was a restrictive covenant and should be taxed in full.

Justine Riccomini outlines what happened when a termination of employment settlement agreement relating to a restrictive covenant payment arrived before the First Tier Tax Tribunal.

Tax cases relating to termination payment settlements are not as common as they used to be. This case, known as “Mrs A v HMRC” was heard at the First Tier Tribunal and the decision was issued at the end of 2022.

Background

HMRC issued a closure notice to Mrs A in respect of a claim she had made in her 2018-19 tax return that would have resulted in an overpayment of tax  amounting to £467,684. The claim was reduced to £6,136. Therefore, the appeal to the FTT involved a considerable sum of money (£461,548).

Mrs A had received a termination settlement amounting to £1,055,000 in May 2018 in return for her agreement to discontinue a claim to the Employment Tribunal and respect confidentialities. HMRC considered that the settlement was taxable under sections 401(1) 403(1) of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003 (ITEPA 2003), allowing for the first £30,000 to be exempt from taxation. Mrs A argued that the payment received was not connected to the termination of her employment but was made in return for her agreement to respect the confidentialities.

HMRC then argued that if the sum received did not represent a termination payment, it must represent a restrictive covenant as Mrs A’s conduct or activities were being fettered by the settlement agreement which she had signed. This would make it chargeable to tax under s.225 of ITEPA 2003 instead. Mrs A agreed that a restrictive undertaking had been signed up to but that it was nothing to do with her employment.

What was the court being asked to resolve?

Two issues required consideration, these were:

  1. Whether the settlement value represented A) a termination payment, or B) a payment in return for agreeing not to do something (this could be not to pursue an Employment Tribunal claim or not to disclose confidentialities); or
  2. If the payment was deemed to be B), whether this represented a restrictive undertaking taxable under s.225 ITEPA 2003.

Deliberations

When the employer did not uphold Mrs A’s original grievance, the decision also contained a request to respect confidentiality. Mrs A sought advice on the matter from a professional adviser and commenced proceedings at the Employment Tribunal. The adviser had covered the notional charges to tax under both s.401 and s.225 ITEPA 2003, should a termination of employment occur, but Mrs A argued that at that stage, she had not considered leaving the employment, so the settlement agreement which was being proposed did not relate to her termination of employment at that time. However, after that, Mrs A decided that she was unable to carry on working for the employer due to the stress of it all and agreed to leave. Her lawyer agreed on a settlement figure of £1.1m under the provisions of a settlement agreement.

Mrs A suffered the substantial tax deduction noted above and wrote to HMRC to ask whether the tax treatment had been correct. She believed that the payment was not compensation for loss of employment, but rather, for injury to feelings – however under s.406 ITEPA 2003, injury is only exempt if it is classed as psychiatric and injury to feelings is not exempt. She then completed her self-assessment return to show an overpayment. HMRC opened an enquiry into the return and concluded that s.401 ITEPA should apply to it.  As this would mean the first £30,000 would be exempt, she could only claim an overpayment of £6,136.

Several key sections of the settlement agreement were relied on by the FTT to assist them in reaching their conclusions, as well as numerous other tax cases on termination payments, each of which has a distinct fact pattern, but which enabled the judiciary to conclude that section 401 was widely drawn as it states: “or otherwise in connection with an employment”.

Conclusions and decision

The FTT concluded: “In our view, it is clear from the terms of the Settlement Agreement that the payment was, at the very least, in consequence of or otherwise connected with the termination of Mrs A’s employment.” However, this was a secondary consideration. The FTT also concluded that the primary decision had to be that the payment must have come under the charge to tax at s.225 ITEPA 2003 (and be taxable in full).

Statement of Practice 3/96 determines that if a specific payment is made in return for an agreement not to pursue an employment claim via the Employment Tribunal, it should automatically qualify as a restrictive covenant payment under s.225 ITEPA 2003. The Tax Tribunal chose to note that a Statement of Practice is merely an HMRC interpretation and has no legal force – but came to the same effective conclusion independently from its review of the settlement agreement clauses which repeatedly referred to restrictions being the main reason for the payment, that s.225 should apply anyway.

The FTT concluded: “There is no doubt that an agreement not to pursue claims or proceedings is a restrictive undertaking within the scope of section 225.” They went on to conclude at paragraphs 63 and 64 of the decision: “It was paid…in respect of the restrictive undertaking given by Mrs A that she would not make or pursue any claims against the Employer and/or the Owner relating to or arising out of her employment or its termination. Accordingly, we find that the Compensation Sum is chargeable to tax as earnings from employment under section 225(3).

That conclusion is sufficient to determine this appeal but, in case we are wrong, we consider whether the payment was received by Mrs A ‘directly or indirectly in consideration or in consequence of, or otherwise in connection with’ the termination of her employment and is therefore chargeable to tax as employment income, to the extent that it exceeds £30,000, under section 403(1).”

The FTT decided that the settlement could not be apportioned into different elements because it was clear that it was received primarily as a restrictive covenant and derived from employment. The appeal was dismissed and leave of appeal granted, to expire within 56 days.

Final thoughts

As the amount Mrs A received was deemed to be wholly taxable under s.225, technically speaking this negates the residual overpayment of £6,136 originally allowed by HMRC when they concluded the payment fell within s.401 ITEPA 2003. If HMRC acts upon this FTT decision and disallows the overpayment, Mrs A will be worse off than if she had accepted their original decision

If you wish to contribute to the debate…why not join an ICAS tax committee and bring your expertise straight to the Tax team?

Met Police case tests basic PAYE principles

By Justine Riccomini, Head of Tax (Employment and Devolved taxes)

30 September 2022

Are your clients thinking of paying employees in cryptocurrency?

By Justine Riccomini, Head of Tax (Employment and Devolved taxes)

7 July 2022

2022-11-mitigo 2022-11-mitigo
ICAS logo

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

ICAS logo

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: