ICAS ICAS logo

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Careers support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Finance + Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Business and governance
    5. Charities
    6. Coronavirus
    7. Corporate and financial reporting
    8. Cyber security
    9. Ethics
    10. Insolvency
    11. ICAS Research
    12. Pensions
    13. Practice
    14. Public sector
    15. Sustainability
    16. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD courses and qualifications
    2. CPD news and updates
    3. CPD support and advice
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

Could Universal Basic Income work?

Header
  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
Donald-Drysdale By Donald Drysdale for ICAS

12 April 2018

Main Points

  • Universal Basic Income is a concept that offers scope for simplifying taxes and state benefits.

  • Commentators question whether it would be affordable.

  • With Scotland and other countries running trials, perhaps it deserves consideration UK-wide.

If Universal Basic Income is regarded as Utopian, then Donald Drysdale is all for Utopia. Here he introduces the concept.

An opportunity for change

If the Scottish Government has its way, Scotland could find itself in the vanguard of a new social experiment which might have the potential to transform our society and dramatically simplify the UK’s beleaguered tax and state benefit regimes.

In its Programme for Government 2017/18 entitled ‘A Nation with Ambition’, published last September, the minority SNP administration in Edinburgh pledged that one of its next steps would be to explore a universal basic income (‘UBI’) or ‘citizen’s income’ by funding research into the feasibility of such a system.

In its purest sense, UBI involves government in providing an unconditional income to every individual citizen, regardless of age or circumstances, rather than on a household or means-tested basis.  This radical concept has been gathering support globally.  Variants of UBI are being trialled in the USA, Canada, Finland, Kenya, Uganda and Spain.  Experiments are also likely in the Netherlands, France, Italy and now Scotland.

Work of the Citizen’s Basic Income Trust

The Citizen’s Basic Income Trust (CBIT) is a charity which promotes debate on the desirability and feasibility of UBI, having been studying the concept for more than three decades.  In 2017 it published an explanatory booklet which serves as a useful introduction to key aspects of UBI.

The booklet identifies six fundamental ways in which UBI would differ from the UK’s existing tax and welfare arrangements.  Legal residence would become the basis of entitlement, subject to a minimum period in the UK. The individual would be the unit for calculating tax and benefits; age, gender, marriage, civil partnership and cohabitation would be neither subsidised nor penalised.

UBI would not be withdrawn by reference to other income or assets owned, so reporting would be minimised; work (paid and unpaid) would be encouraged, and saving for old age would be more worthwhile. With no ‘availability-for-work’ rule, education, training and unpaid voluntary work would no longer be discouraged.

Access to UBI would be unconditional. Every citizen should find it easy to know their entitlement and their obligations, so take-up would be nearly 100%. UBI would be indexed to a measure such as GDP per capita rather than prices, to maintain an acceptable balance between the citizen’s basic income and the higher taxes needed to fund it.

Work of the RSA

The RSA (Royal Society for the encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce) is a 260-year old charity which exists to enrich society through ideas and action. In recent years it has promoted the concept of UBI, and in December 2015 it published a report ‘Creative citizen, creative state’ making the case for such a system.

The report claimed that there was a compelling case for introducing UBI in the UK, where the welfare state was no longer fit for purpose. It argued that UBI would help individuals to cope as technological progress caused under-employment, unemployment or the need for career changes. It would also create a society in which people could care for their relatives, friends and neighbours without having to account to the state for their actions.

Among questions addressed in the RSA’s 2015 report were whether implementation of UBI could be fiscally neutral, and whether distributional consequences of UBI would be appropriate and politically acceptable.

The RSA concluded that UBI was the best way to incentivise work at every income level. Compared with existing tax credits which involve marginal withdrawal rates around 80% at some low-income levels, even under the new universal credit, the UBI scheme they proposed at that stage involved no dramatic cliff edges.

This February the RSA published a further report entitled ‘Pathways to Universal Basic Income’. Instead of boldly proposing the implementation of UBI, this went off at a tangent by suggesting the creation of a Universal Basic Opportunity Fund (UBOF).  This would fund every citizen under age 55 with a £5,000 ‘opportunity dividend’ for up to two years, taken at a time of their choosing over the course of a specified decade.

In my view, the UBOF proposal misses its target. Instead of pressing for a fundamental shift to a fairer, simpler tax and benefits regime under UBI, it offers a temporary measure that would likely be seen as complex and divisive.

Could we afford UBI?

Commentators wonder whether UBI would be affordable. Critics have either questioned its economic feasibility or argued that it is overly-simplistic and Utopian.

The RSA’s 2015 report claimed that the UK-wide scheme it outlined would cost approximately 1% of GDP – well within precedents established by some discretionary tax policy changes – although it had not addressed how pre-existing disability support and housing subsidies would be tackled.

CBIT suggest that UBI would effectively merge the income tax and benefits systems. UBI, paid automatically, would be recouped by levying income tax on all other income and by ending most means-tested benefits. Instead of different regimes for taxpayers and benefit claimants, UBI would treat everyone alike.

While UBI would be funded through higher taxes, even those paying these would receive UBI.  However, for taxpayers and practitioners hoping for a simpler regime, the latest RSA report makes some alarming suggestions.  These include an annual wealth tax of 1.2% on individuals' net assets over £700,000; a levy on the assets of the FTSE 350 companies; and a tax on usage of public data or on the transfer of data assets to online platforms and others.

Another RSA suggestion is that the UK might borrow £200 billion at current low interest rates to create a Sovereign Wealth Fund.  However, I have to question whether interest rates will remain low for a post-Brexit Britain, and whether the necessary investment returns would ever materialise.

UBI in Scotland

The Scottish Government has committed £250,000 of funding for Edinburgh, Fife, Glasgow and North Ayrshire local authorities to conduct feasibility studies and develop UBI pilots.

This funding will be available to cover a two-year period from April 2018 and will help establish a Scottish evidence base, exploring how UBI could be delivered and what the costs and benefits might be.

Political perspectives

Many advocates of UBI are fired by left-wing, socialist objectives aimed at redistributing income and wealth.  Paradoxically, the concept also finds support in right-wing political circles where it is seen as having potential to reduce interference by the state.

Among supporters of UBI, some (including the RSA) wish to ease the transition or make it politically more acceptable by grafting changes on to the existing tax and welfare systems. Such an approach would add complexity while restricting potential benefits.  Instead, UBI alone would give everyone – including parents, carers and learners – a basic subsistence level of security to pursue their lives without interference, while also providing a clear yet non-coercive incentive either to work or to contribute to society in other ways.

The interest from Holyrood is opportune.   Some have seen UK fiscal devolution as a missed opportunity. Devolved administrations are intent on creating new taxes that largely mirror the rules and complexities of pre-existing UK-wide regimes, while Westminster has retained control of many welfare arrangements.

By contrast, UBI might provide an opportunity to fundamentally simplify tax and welfare systems, increase personal freedoms and adjust to new labour market conditions – not only in Scotland but across the UK.

It would take brave politicians to bite the bullet and implement UBI. Any volunteers?

Article supplied by Taxing Words Ltd

How to simplify tax law and policy

By Donald Drysdale for ICAS

15 January 2018

2022-11-mitigo 2022-11-mitigo
ICAS logo

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

ICAS logo

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: