ICAS ICAS logo

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Careers support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Finance + Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Business and governance
    5. Charities
    6. Coronavirus
    7. Corporate and financial reporting
    8. Cyber security
    9. Ethics
    10. Insolvency
    11. ICAS Research
    12. Pensions
    13. Practice
    14. Public sector
    15. Sustainability
    16. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD courses and qualifications
    2. CPD news and updates
    3. CPD support and advice
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

A question of best judgement?

  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
Justine Riccomini By Justine Riccomini, Head of Taxation (Scottish Taxes, Employment and ICAS Tax Community)

3 November 2020

Main points:

  • This latest CIS First Tier Tribunal case deals with the perennial issue of the deduction for cost of materials
  • HMRC is naturally alert to the potential for over-deductions in this area
  • By questioning the use of “best judgement” of the HMRC officer, the taxpayer saved £127,000 at the First Tier Tribunal

Justine Riccomini discusses the outcome of the most recent CIS case to come to the Tribunal, which concerns itself with the age-old problem of the deductions for cost of materials from the gross payments to a subcontractor.

The Issue

In the case of Elmpine Developments Ltd [2020] TC 07830/ [2020] UKFTT 0351 (TC), the taxpayer (“Elmpine”) appealed against a determination made under Regulation 13(2) of SI 2005/2045 [Income Tax (Construction Industry Scheme) Regulations 2005] which allows an HMRC officer the discretion of using their ‘best judgement’ when computing liabilities and corresponding deductions.

Previous cases include the notable Van Boeckel v C&E Commrs [1980] 1 BVC 378 which imposed a protocol whereby the Tribunal must satisfy itself initially that the conclusions of the officer are unreasonable before proceeding to hear the detail.

In this case, Elmpine’s appeal made the representation that the officer had chosen not to take into account a crucial invoice containing a breakdown of labour and materials from a sub-contractor, which was issued when the sub-contractor was in voluntary liquidation. In its examination, the FTT found ‘no reason’ why a company in the process of a voluntary liquidation could not issue a valid invoice, and therefore, why the invoice could not be taken into account by the officer. As such, it was concluded by the FTT that the officer had acted unreasonably by refusing to admit the invoice and disallowing the materials costs in their entirety.

The disagreement

The disagreement came to light following a compliance review by HMRC in 2016 whereby HMRC discovered that Elmpine had not registered under CIS although it had been carrying out relevant works since October 2013. The business registered under the CIS in November 2016 and HMRC proceeded to retrospectively assess the amounts considered to be due to it between October 2013 and October 2016.

Following various adjustments to the computation, which were agreed by Elmpine, there remained a question over an invoice from AKY Contractors Limited which reflected a breakdown of the total payments of £648,500, as to £423,240 related to materials and £225,260 related to labour.

The HMRC officer refused to admit the invoice as the company was in liquidation and had been for over 9 months by the time the invoice was rendered. After some to-ing and fro-ing, HMRC resolved to issue a Reg.13(2) Income Tax (Construction Industry Scheme) Regulations 2005 determination for a total of £295,133 (reduced to £250,146 following a review), and based on total gross payments of £833,820. The disputed sums within that determination amounted to £639,770 of which the CIS withholding was £191,931.

Statutory Review

Elmpine appealed to the Tribunal in January 2019 following a request for a Statutory Review, the outcome of which was to uphold the HMRC review and determination, albeit to remove £22,000 from the assessment which had been incorrectly attributed to the wrong tax year.

The decision

The FTT decision, which was published on 2 September 2020, was to partially allow the taxpayer’s appeal on the basis that HMRC had acted unreasonably by choosing not to take account of evidence which related to the cost of the materials purchased. This led to the due amounts being adjusted by the Tribunal Judge, who said that he found the HMRC officer’s approach “very hard to understand”. The final AKY Contractors Ltd 30% withholding was calculated to be due at £64,959 based on a gross value of £216,530 – quite some way away from the original determination of three times that, of £639,770.
Summary

The legislation governing the deduction of tax under the CIS is set out in s60 Finance Act 2004. It remains to be seen whether HMRC will choose to appeal this decision, which by its very nature is not binding… but does seem eminently sensible. Making use of the ability to query “Best Judgement” therefore proved worth the effort in this case.

£215,000 tax bill for being generous (and don’t leave it all to your tax software)

By Philip McNeill, Head of Taxation (Tax Practice and Owner Managed Business Taxes)

24 September 2020

contract_discussion

Employment Tax Working Group

2-23-marsh 2-23-marsh
ICAS logo

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

ICAS logo

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: