ICAS ICAS logo

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Careers support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Finance + Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Business and governance
    5. Charities
    6. Coronavirus
    7. Corporate and financial reporting
    8. Cyber security
    9. Ethics
    10. Insolvency
    11. ICAS Research
    12. Pensions
    13. Practice
    14. Public sector
    15. Sustainability
    16. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD courses and qualifications
    2. CPD news and updates
    3. CPD support and advice
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

5 key risks confronting HMRC

Tightrope_Walker_Horizon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
Donald-Drysdale By Donald Drysdale for ICAS

25 January 2018

Main Points

  • The PAC again criticises HMRC’s service standards and call-handling performance.
  • HMRC’s transformation programme would have been less risky had they not tried to do everything at the same time.
  • HMRC must sort out their priorities and abandon or suspend non-essential projects.

There are few surprises in the latest report on HMRC’s performance in 2016/17, but Donald Drysdale finds that there is much to be done.

“Taxpayers must not suffer”

In November an article questioned how HMRC would cope.  Given the pressures confronting them, the Autumn Budget might have been the last straw.

Wide-ranging concerns are expressed in a report out this month from the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee (PAC).  It examines HMRC’s performance in 2016/17, and demands that taxpayers must not suffer as HMRC face tough decisions on the future.

HMRC transformation

The report concludes that HMRC’s much-publicised transformation is not deliverable as planned, owing to unrealistic assumptions made and a potential 15% extra workload from projects relating to Brexit.  HMRC admitted that it was not credible to continue with their transformation programme as it was, and that it would have been less risky had they not tried to do everything at the same time.

HMRC plan to re-prioritise their programme by March and then advise ministers on what should be delayed or stopped.  The PAC calls on HMRC to report back in April, with clear plans on how they will manage the many challenges arising from Brexit and their ongoing transformation projects.  It asked them to update their assumptions and forecasts for the transformation, particularly those concerning demand for their various services.

Contrary to earlier advice from the PAC, HMRC have continued to negotiate predominantly 25-year leases without break clauses for their new regional centres.  The PAC is not convinced that HMRC will obtain value for money from these, and calls for greater flexibility. It criticises HMRC for poor negotiating, and for failing to recognise the possibility of massive changes in business technology and tax administration over the next quarter-century.

HMRC service standards

HMRC employ 25,000 staff to deal with taxpayers and agents by telephone, post and online. The future quality of this service will depend on further funding currently being sought from HM Treasury.

A key assumption HMRC made in 2015 was that pressure on their phone contact centres would reduce as more digital services were introduced.  However, in 2016/17 the number of calls increased by 8 million.

Based on the early months of 2017/18, HMRC expect reductions in the number of calls. However, they couldn’t assure the PAC that call centre staff numbers would be maintained until it was certain that demand for their services had reduced.  This is potentially bad news for taxpayers and agents alike.

HMRC are criticised for how they measure call-handling performance.  Claims of calls being answered after an average 4½ minutes waiting time concealed the fact that they measured this from when the automated messages end – which themselves could take up to 4 minutes.  To add insult to injury, HMRC’s statistics assume that all callers who hang up during the automated messaging have had their query resolved!

HMRC claimed that an acceptable average speed to answer phone calls would be 5 minutes – including the automated messages.  The PAC recommends that this be adopted as a target within a new set of measures that better reflect the actual experience of callers.

The PAC dislikes the disparity of service given to high-net-worth taxpayers compared with others – especially the vulnerable.  It warns of potential risks to service standards in future, and calls on HMRC to deliver a consistent and reasonable level of service to all.

Tax credits

According to HMRC, error and fraud increased spending on tax credits by 4.8% in 2014/15. For 2015/16 this had worsened to 5.5%, equating to £210 million underpaid and a massive £1.57 billion overpaid.  HMRC expect the rate to rise to 7% or 8% – well above their target of 5%.

HMRC blame the deterioration on several factors.  First they cite a reduction in staff tackling error and fraud following the end of their controversial out-sourcing contract with Concentrix. HM Treasury decided not to replace the Concentrix costs in HMRC’s budget, nor to fund the £34 million cost of replacing lost staff which (on HMRC’s estimates) should have prevented fraud and error of £120 million.

Second, HMRC blamed the introduction in 2015 of a new test requiring self-employed claimants to show they are carrying on an organised and regular business on a commercial basis with a view to profit.  This test reduced tax credits pay-outs by more than £500 million a year, but was expected to increase the fraud and error rate by 1%.

Third, HMRC explained that the migration to Universal Credit, which moves tax credit cases to the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), is transferring the most straightforward cases first – leaving HMRC with a higher proportion of complex claims.

The PAC expresses particular concerns about how HMRC will work with the DWP to manage the transition of vulnerable people from tax credits to Universal Credit, and how such claimants will be protected from the DWP’s greater powers to reclaim overpayments due to error and fraud.

Tax avoidance and evasion

HMRC attributed almost half the tax gap to SMEs, and believed that several measures would address this sector – notably, introducing Making Tax Digital (MTD) for business, and working more closely with tax agents and online marketplaces.  The PAC calls on HMRC to set target levels for reducing the tax gap, including for the SME sector, and to explain how they will be more responsive to emerging risks.

The Panama Papers, published in April 2016, have resulted so far in 66 criminal or civil investigations, expected to raise tax of £100 million.

The report refers to potentially serious allegations of tax evasion and avoidance arising from the Paradise Papers and calls on HMRC to obtain information from these as soon as possible.  However, the PAC expresses doubt as to whether HMRC has sufficient resources to deal with the full scale of the recent allegations.

Brexit

The report says little directly about Brexit, largely because the PAC had addressed key concerns in Brexit and the future of Customs published in November.

That earlier report concluded that it would be catastrophic if HMRC’s new customs system is not ready in time to cope with a possible five-fold increase in customs declarations, and if there is no viable fall-back option.  A failed customs system could lead to huge disruption for businesses.

The PAC acknowledged that uncertainty regarding the outcome of UK-EU negotiations is a complicating factor, but it should not be used by HMRC to avoid taking action – particularly scaling up the existing customs service, ensuring a viable contingency plan is in place, and communicating with traders.

Conclusion

We are often quick to criticise HMRC and other public sector bodies, with comments such as “a private sector business would never operate in that way”.  Doubtless such an accusation could be made now, but Brexit adds a different slant and serves as a timely reminder of the importance of public services which are properly funded.

The actions or inactions of politicians and governments, not only in the UK but also across the EU, have introduced huge uncertainties for businesses and HMRC alike.  HMRC must clearly sort out their priorities as a matter of urgency and abandon or suspend non-essential projects.  And they must also receive the political support and funding they require – for if they don’t they may be powerless to continue administering the UK tax system in the way we expect of them.

Article supplied by Taxing Words Ltd

2022-11-mitigo 2022-11-mitigo
ICAS logo

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

ICAS logo

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: