ICAS ICAS logo

Quicklinks

  1. About Us

    Find out about who we are and what we do here at ICAS.

  2. Find a CA

    Search our directory of individual CAs and Member organisations by name, location and professional criteria.

  3. CA Magazine

    View the latest issues of the dedicated magazine for ICAS Chartered Accountants.

  4. Contact Us

    Get in touch with ICAS by phone, email or post, with dedicated contacts for Members, Students and firms.

Login
  • Annual renewal
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Find a CA
  1. About us
    1. Governance
  2. Members
    1. Become a member
    2. Newly qualified
    3. Manage my membership
    4. Benefits of membership
    5. Careers support
    6. Mentoring
    7. CA Wellbeing
    8. More for Members
    9. Area networks
    10. International communities
    11. Get involved
    12. Top Young CAs
    13. Career breaks
    14. ICAS podcast
    15. Newly admitted members 2022
    16. Newly admitted members 2023
  3. CA Students
    1. Student information
    2. Student resources
    3. Learning requirements
    4. Learning updates
    5. Learning blog
    6. Totum Pro | Student discount card
    7. CA Student wellbeing
  4. Become a CA
    1. How to become a CA
    2. Routes to becoming a CA
    3. CA Stories
    4. Find a training agreement
    5. Why become a CA
    6. Qualification information
    7. University exemptions
  5. Employers
    1. Become an Authorised Training Office
    2. Resources for Authorised Training Offices
    3. Professional entry
    4. Apprenticeships
  6. Find a CA
  7. ICAS events
    1. CA Summit
  8. CA magazine
  9. Insight
    1. Finance + Trust
    2. Finance + Technology
    3. Finance + EDI
    4. Finance + Mental Fitness
    5. Finance + Leadership
    6. Finance + Sustainability
  10. Professional resources
    1. Anti-money laundering
    2. Audit and assurance
    3. Brexit
    4. Charities
    5. Coronavirus
    6. Corporate and financial reporting
    7. Business and governance
    8. Ethics
    9. Insolvency
    10. ICAS Research
    11. Pensions
    12. Practice
    13. Public sector
    14. Sustainability
    15. Tax
  11. CPD - professional development
    1. CPD courses and qualifications
    2. CPD news and updates
    3. CPD support and advice
  12. Regulation
    1. Complaints and sanctions
    2. Regulatory authorisations
    3. Guidance and help sheets
    4. Regulatory monitoring
  13. CA jobs
    1. CA jobs partner: Rutherford Cross
    2. Resources for your job search
    3. Advertise with CA jobs
    4. Hays | A Trusted ICAS CA Jobs Partner
    5. Azets | What's your ambition?
  14. Work at ICAS
    1. Business centres
    2. Meet our team
    3. Benefits
    4. Vacancies
    5. Imagine your career at ICAS
  15. Contact us
    1. Technical and regulation queries
    2. ICAS logo request

ICAS responds to the EC Consultation on Corporate Reporting – improving its quality and enforcement

  • LinkedIn (opens new window)
  • Twitter (opens new window)
By James E Barbour CA, ICAS Director of Policy Leadership

16 February 2022

Main points

  • ICAS has responded to the European Commission’s consultation on corporate reporting – improving its quality and enforcement and the related call for evidence.
  • Read the ICAS response in full

ICAS responds to the European Commission’s consultation on corporate reporting – improving its quality and enforcement

ICAS has responded to the European Commission (EC)’s consultation on ‘corporate reporting – improving its quality and enforcement’ and the related call for evidence. This is the first stage of the EU process as it considers what reforms are required to the corporate reporting ecosystem for public interest entities (PIEs). The key points from the ICAS response are set out below.

Overall

  • ICAS welcomes that the EC is undertaking a holistic review of the corporate reporting ecosystem i.e., corporate governance, corporate reporting, audit, and their supervision. In order to improve the existing corporate reporting ecosystem, it is essential to examine each of these constituent parts to determine what reforms are necessary, as all have a key role to play. This approach recognises that external audit does not operate in a vacuum but rather forms part of the wider corporate governance and reporting framework that oversees large corporate entities. The desired outcome is of course a regulatory environment that not only protects the interests of investors and the wider public interest, but also ensures that businesses in the EU have a regulatory environment that is proportionate and respected. It is imperative that the final changes which are taken forward, post the consultation process, respect this need for holistic reform, and are delivered in a co-ordinated manner.
  • The 2014 EU Audit Regulation was primarily designed to: increase auditor independence, enhance choice in the PIE audit market, improve audit quality and enhance supervision of audit firms. Evidence would suggest that these aims have only partially been met e.g., mandatory audit firm rotation has had minimal effect on the levels of choice and concentration in the PIE audit markets in member states.
  • The extent of member state options in the Regulation would appear to have hindered the impact of the package of measures included in the EU Audit Regulation. This has resulted in undue complexity across the EU. Therefore, simplifying and harmonising the existing requirements on audit would be beneficial.

Corporate Governance

  • Currently, the EU Framework for corporate governance is limited and thus not conducive to promoting a consistent approach across member states. Consequently, there is a range of corporate governance frameworks and practices across EU member states. Enhanced requirements at the EU level would likely improve the situation, subject to appropriate enforcement.
  • Additionally, there is a need to better facilitate an understanding amongst stakeholders that the responsibility for running an entity and for preparing its financial statements rests with the directors of that entity, in particular, the executive directors. The inclusion of a broader responsibilities chart at the front of the annual report, and/or on a company website, may help to better convey to stakeholders the respective responsibilities of the key players, including the directors and auditors.
  • Furthermore, requiring directors to report on the effectiveness of an entity’s internal controls over financial reporting would better promote the respective responsibilities of directors and auditors. When analysing recent corporate failures, it is clear that there have been weaknesses in such controls.

Corporate reporting, audit, and supervisory quality indicators

  • There is considerable merit in establishing recognised quality indicators for corporate reporting, statutory audit, and supervision. In order to promote their acceptance and use, their development would need to involve all key stakeholders. Consideration might also be given to the development of quality indicators in relation to corporate governance or performance of audit committees.
  • Various sets of audit quality indicators (AQIs) have been developed by different bodies across the globe, but none are seen as generally accepted. Used appropriately and in the proper context, AQIs could be an effective mechanism to improve audit quality but they need to be specific to the needs of users, and the user group will of course vary; from the firms themselves, audit committees, users of financial statements and regulators. The true value of AQIs goes beyond the quantitative measurements and therefore such measures should not be solely based on inputs or outputs. There is a need to understand what the deeper underlying insights are. Therefore, interpretation of AQIs also has to take account of various other factors such as the nature of the organisation and its operating environment, the audit approach, and communication between the auditor and management/the audit committee during the audit.

Sustainability

  • COP26 has reiterated the need for immediate action in relation to sustainability. ICAS is therefore fully supportive of the EU’s European Green Deal ambitions. Corporate reporting has to embrace sustainability and not just on climate change. This is what investors and other stakeholders are demanding in order that the true impact of an entity’s business model and operations can be assessed

Global Alignment

  • There is a need to ensure that alignment is maintained with the global standards issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) and International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) as in many cases PIEs operate in various jurisdictions.
  • A number of significant revisions to these standards (not yet applicable) have taken place in the last 15 months including on quality management, group audits and tighter restrictions on the ability of audit firms to provide non-assurance services to PIE audit clients.

Non-audit services

  • Auditors should be allowed to provide non-audit services where such services do not impair, either the real or perceived independence of the auditor. This would include services that are required by law or regulation; and other services where the auditor is best placed to provide the said service and there is little threat to the independence of the auditor e.g., reviews of interim financial information.

Competition and choice

  • There is limited number of audit firms in the PIE audit market. Therefore, there is a need to determine the best mechanism to help reduce the level of concentration in the PIE audit market and an acceptance that any policy introduced will only have a substantive impact over a longer-term period. This will allow firms to better plan and invest to ensure that they have appropriate resources at their disposal to take on the audits of a number of such entities. On their own, legislative measures would not be sufficient.
  • There is also a need for audit firms to want to operate in this market. Therefore, consideration also has to be given to matters such as the regulatory burden, and auditor liability regime.

Supervision

  • There is considerable variation across the EU in terms of the mechanisms used for, and quality of, supervision by public authorities of auditors, in particular, with respect to the methodologies applied on inspections, the transparency of reports thereon, and methods of investigations and sanctioning.
  • The role of the Committee of European Auditing Oversight Bodies (CEOAB) and its relationship and interactions with national oversight authorities needs revisiting with a view to strengthening the current framework to help facilitate more effective and efficient supervision across the EU.
  • In relation to the supervision of corporate reporting, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) plays a key role, but this could be further enhanced by strengthening its authority over national competent authorities to improve the consistency and quality of supervision.
  • There is also merit in creating a regulatory environment that is designed such that regulators aim to work constructively with PIEs and their auditors to raise the overall standard of corporate governance, reporting and audit quality.
  • Audit regulators need to consider whether a compliance-based inspection model remains suitable for audit. Unlike many aspects of prudential and financial services, audit is not just about processes and procedures but also about management and auditor judgements. Therefore, supervisors should not only check auditors’ compliance with standards and legislation, but they should properly consider the use of professional scepticism and judgement. Additionally, to allow for timely rectification of any weaknesses identified, the time period between an inspection being undertaken and the auditor being informed of inspection result should be subject to an appropriate maximum limit.

Investors

  • There is a need to promote greater involvement of the investment community as they also have a key role to play in holding companies to account.

Read the full response

ICAS responds to IAASB Exposure Draft - International Standard on Auditing for Less Complex Entities

By James E Barbour CA, ICAS Director of Policy Leadership

3 February 2022

FRC issues draft three-year plan and budget to prepare for the transition to ARGA

By James E Barbour CA, Director, Policy Leadership

21 January 2022

2022-01-xero 2022-01-xero
ICAS logo

Footer links

  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions
  • Modern slavery statement
  • Privacy notice
  • CA magazine

Connect with ICAS

  • Facebook (opens new window) Facebook Icon
  • Twitter (opens new window) Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn (opens new window) LinkedIn Icon
  • Instagram (opens new window) Instagram Icon

ICAS is a member of the following bodies

  • Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies (opens new window) Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies logo
  • Chartered Accountants Worldwide (opens new window) Chartered Accountants Worldwide logo
  • Global Accounting Alliance (opens new window) Global Accounting Alliance
  • International Federation of Accountants (opens new window) IFAC
  • Access Accountancy (opens new window) Access Acountancy

Charities

  • ICAS Foundation (opens new window) ICAS Foundation
  • SCABA (opens new window) scaba

Accreditations

  • ISO 9001 - RGB (opens new window)
© ICAS 2022

The mark and designation “CA” is a registered trade mark of The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS), and is available for use in the UK and EU only to members of ICAS. If you are not a member of ICAS, you should not use the “CA” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to accountancy, tax or insolvency services. The mark and designation “Chartered Accountant” is a registered trade mark of ICAS, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales and Chartered Accountants Ireland. If you are not a member of one of these organisations, you should not use the “Chartered Accountant” mark and designation in the UK or EU in relation to these services. Further restrictions on the use of these marks also apply where you are a member.

ICAS logo

Our cookie policy

ICAS.com uses cookies which are essential for our website to work. We would also like to use analytical cookies to help us improve our website and your user experience. Any data collected is anonymised. Please have a look at the further information in our cookie policy and confirm if you are happy for us to use analytical cookies: